Category Archives: Junk science

Why I Think the US Justice System is Broken – and Why It’s Not Getting Fixed

broken column 3I was recently made aware of a quote from the ancient Greek playwright, Euripides. “Ours is a universe in which justice is accidental, and innocence no protection.”  I often feel like this describes our current justice system exactly, but it’s not supposed to be that way, and it doesn’t HAVE to be that way.  As with any system established and run by “humans,” the justice system, including those who run it, is exposed to the entire gamut of human frailties – pride, ego, ambition, greed, envy, passion, deceit, prejudice, hate, intolerance, power, influence, and on and on.  The situation hasn’t really changed since ancient Greece, and I don’t see the nature of humanity changing radically any time in the next  few thousand years, but there are things that can be done to at least mitigate the effect of these human shortcomings on the justice system.  This post will be comprehensive and quite long – so, buckle up, and here we go.  I hope that those of  you who have the patience to read through to the end may find it interesting, enlightening, and hopefully thought provoking.

As you might guess from the title, this post will be “editorial” in nature.  I’ve been doing innocence work for five years now, and have worked with seven different Innocence Projects from across the US and one foreign country.  Over that time, I’ve been exposed to the fine details of over 40 different cases.  These are all post-conviction cases in which there is a belief by the associated Innocence Project in the actual innocence of the defendant, and thus belief of a “wrongful conviction” on the part of the justice system.  In addition, my research in these cases has exposed me to many other additional cases in which a wrongful conviction occurred.  Consequently, I’ve seen a lot of the things that can go wrong in the justice system, and have been able to make judgments about how they happen.  This post will coalesce my observations into statements about why I think the US justice system is broken.  I’m going to be painting a pretty dark picture, so keep in mind that my exposure has been to cases in which the justice system failed, but there are lots of them.  There really isn’t any substantiated data for how many wrongful convictions occur in the US every year, but recent data says it’s between 5,000 and 10,000 per year.  One is too many.  At the end of the post, we’ll talk about why it’s not getting fixed.

I’m not an attorney, and some may accuse me of being a naive, optimistic idealist (which I am) or of tracking muddy footprints through the hallowed halls of justice; but I am only reporting what I have observed.  And if you think I’m making some of this stuff up, I strongly recommend you read the book False Justice: Eight Myths That Convict the Innocent by Jim and Nancy Petro.  (It’s available from amazon.com for $16.)  Jim is a former Attorney General for the state of Ohio, and Nancy, in addition to being an author and advocate, is also a contributing editor to this blog.  Now, are there good and dedicated prosecutors and police out there who are absolutely committed to seeing that true justice is served?  Of course.  Are there qualified and capable attorneys who will do their utmost on behalf of their clients?  Of course.  Unfortunately, there are also “others.”

All that being said  ……..

Why I Think the US Justice System is Broken

(As a preview, we’ll touch upon Bad Lawyers, Prosecutors, Judges, Police, Juries, Junk Science Forensics, False Confessions, Shoddy Work by Medical Examiners, Testimony from Experts Who Aren’t Really Experts, Finality of Judgement, Highly Restrictive Rules for New Evidence, Eyewitness Identification, and Recantations.)

Continue reading

New Scholarship Spotlight: Failed Evidence: Why Law Enforcement Resists Science

harris_david-0187_0Pittsburgh professor David Harris has posted the above-titled article, Chapter 1 of his new book, on SSRN.  Download full text here.  Abstract states:

News reports about police and science like DNA identification, and popular entertainment like the television program CSI and its many imitators, give the impression that science is now the handmaiden of law enforcement. But this picture is at best misleading. Law enforcement does rely on some scientific techniques, but far more often police and prosecution prefer to ignore or even resist science that bears directly on the basics of police investigation. Years of scientific research on eyewitness testimony, police interrogation, and basic forensic techniques (other than DNA and chemical analysis) tells us how these foundational aspects of investigation go wrong. This science also explains how we can improve these aspects of how evidence is gathered and used. This work has been published, peer reviewed, and duplicated – sometimes for decades. But despite the fact that 300 cases of wrongful convictions have now been exposed using DNA, law enforcement continues to resist changes to these basic techniques that police use every day.

The focus of Failed Evidence is why law enforcement resists, and what can be done to overcome it. The resistance to better, more accurate investigative techniques has its roots in two aspects of human thinking: cognitive barriers (e.g., cognitive dissonance, group polarization, and loss aversion), and institutional and political barriers (e.g., the imperatives of arrest and conviction, the ingrained “us versus them” heart of police culture). These problems keep most police and prosecutors from even considering positive change.

From this understanding of why the resistance to science occurs, Failed Evidence distills six recommendations for making change happen, and gives concrete examples of progress from around the nation.

Tuesday’s Quick Clicks…

click

Judge Rules Imprisoned Former Akron Police Captain “Actually Innocent” in Former Wife’s Murder

Summit County Common Pleas Judge Judy Hunter has declared former Akron police Capt. Douglas Prade “actually innocent of aggravated murder” in the killing of his former wife, Dr. Margo Prade. Prade was convicted of her murder in 1997. The judge has ruled that Prade “shall be discharged from prison forthwith.” Continue reading

Flawed fingerprint expert won’t be getting job back…

One of the fingerprint experts at the centre of the Shirley McKie scandal in Scotland (see here…) has lost her bid to get her old job back. Fiona McBride wrongly identified a latent print at the centre of a murder case, which saw PC McKie tried for perjury and eventually compensated three quarters of a million pounds by the Scottish Government. McBride and others were suspended from work, but after a year re-training were re-instated. However, they were not allowed to sign joint reports, nor were they to be court-going experts. The fear was that the McKie misidentification would always come up and prosecutions could fail. McBride appealed to the Court of Sessions, who ruled that she need not be re-instated, but that the Employment Tribunal should re-consider if she should be paid compensation (depending on whether she contributed to her dismissal). Read more here….

921496438

McKie fingerprint expert Fiona McBride fails to win job back

Shirley McKie fingerprint expert loses job appeal

Friday’s Quick Clicks…

click

“Head Start” on a Motion for Post Conviction Relief Based Upon Newly Discovered Evidence in an Arson Case

arsonRecently, Prof. Theresa Newman, co-director of the Duke Law Wrongful Convictions Clinic, and I collaborated on a motion for post conviction relief in an arson case.  I think it turned out well.  It lays out the framework of a legal strategy to pursue a claim of “newly discovered evidence” in an arson case based upon advances in fire science, and contains citations to current fire science literature and to recognized experts in the field of fire science & arson investigation in support of that claim.  I know of several folks who are currently working on arson cases, and I’m sure there must be others; so I thought this might save some effort in what is a lengthy and difficult process.  Perhaps you can use some of the language and/or the cited references.  The “motion” is attached here for your reference.  All case-specific references have been deleted or obscured, and the case-specific reports of experts are not included, but the cited references to publicly available information are appended after the following link to the generic motion:

Arson Post Conviction Motion – New Evidence

Citations:

Lentini:    The Evolution of Fire Investigation and Its Impact on Arson Cases

Lentini:    The Mythology of Arson_Investigation

Lentini:    Nightmare On Lime Street

Carman:    Improving the Understanding of Post Flashover Fire Behavior

Continue reading

Monday’s Quick Clicks…

click
  • Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University 2012 report, outlining 5 exonerations during 2012
  • Judge in Texas considering new trial in arson case of Ed Graf
  • Charges dropped against detective accused of lying in the Tim Masters wrongful conviction case in Colorado
  • Wisconsin Innocence Project wins new trial for Seneca Malone, in prison for murder, based on ineffective assistance of counsel
  • RIP exoneree Bennett Barbour

Daily Trial Coverage of Hang Bin Li Shaken Baby Syndrome Case

AnnieHang Bin Li and his wife, Ying Li, were charged with, and imprisoned for, killing their baby daughter, Annie, in October, 2007.  Recently, all charges against Ying Li were dropped, but her husband is currently undergoing a homicide trial in New York.

.

Please see the previous WCB post on the Hang Bin Li case here.

And you can also see the NY Times article, “What Happened to Baby Annie?” here.

The Chinese community in New York has been their only active supporter, through the media and by blog.  A new blog, presenting daily coverage of the trial, has just been initiated.

You can follow daily blog coverage of the Hang Bin Li trial here.

The blog editor would like to draw your particular attention to ‘day 2′ of the trial, during which the neurosurgeon who testified as an expert for the prosecution, Dr. James T. Goodrich, was cross-examined by defense attorney Cedric Ashley.

Thursday’s Quick Clicks…

click

The Latest in the Medical Debate Over SBS/AHT (Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma)

Well, it seems we’ve got a situation of “dueling journal articles.”

Dr. Sandeep Narang has been one of the more cogent medical authors in support of the conventional SBS/triad theories, and has recently published a paper to that effect:  A DAUBERT ANALYSIS OF ABUSIVE HEAD TRAUMA/SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME.

Prof. Keith Findley, Prof. David Moran, Dr. Patrick Barnes, and Dr. Waney Squier have published a recent paper “in response.”   And by the way, this paper is the best overall summary of the SBS/AHT situation and directions that I have read to date. SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME, ABUSIVE HEAD TRAUMA, AND ACTUAL INNOCENCE:  GETTING IT RIGHT.

And in addition, Dr. Norman Guthkelch, who is the progenitor of the original SBS hypothesis has also published a recent paper in response as well.  PROBLEMS OF INFANT RETINO-DURAL HEMORRHAGE WITH MINIMAL EXTERNAL INJURY.

They may not be great “bedtime reading,” particularly Narang’s paper since it is quite long, but here they are if you’d care to read them:

Narang

Barnes PD. SBS and AHT. Getting it right. Hous J Health Law Poly 2012

Guthkelch AN. Preface to Narang. Hous J Health Law Poly 2012

Witnessed Baby Shakings – Shaken Baby Syndrome

BabyShake

This article addresses Shaken Baby Syndrome, SBS (now officially renamed Abusive Head Trauma – AHT), and the so-called “triad” of symptoms that the bulk of the medical establishment and the justice system say are pathognomonic (exclusively indicative of) of SBS.  The “triad” consists of retinal hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and diffuse edema of the brain, and according to largely prevailing medical wisdom, violent shaking or abusive head trauma is the only thing that can cause these symptoms in an infant or child – not diseases or genetic conditions or short falls.

Documented, witnessed baby shakings are a rare event.  Charges of SBS are almost universally brought against care givers in situations in which there are no witnesses, and the determination of SBS rests solely upon a medical opinion.  Prof. Deborah Tuerkheimer of DePaul University has said that a “post mortem determination of SBS is essentially a medical diagnosis of murder.”

Continue reading

Dismissed Case Raises Questions On Shaken Baby Diagnosis

This is an excellent article, with a link below, but here is a significant quote from the article: (emphasis is mine)

Patrick Barnes, a pediatric neuroradiologist and one of the experts hired by Aspelin’s defense, explained how doctors now recognize “a variety of accidental and natural causes” that are sometimes overlooked in cases that are first diagnosed as shaken baby syndrome.

Barnes had testified for the prosecution in one of the most famous shaken baby syndrome cases — at the 1997 trial of English au pair Louise Woodward in Massachusetts. Since then he has come to believe that the syndrome is overdiagnosed and misdiagnosed.

You can read the article here.

Execution Imminent in Taiwan

Cheng Hsing-tse was arrested on 5 January 2002 and accused of killing a police officer during a gunfight. He was sentenced to death for murder by the Taichung District Court on 18 November 2002. The case bounced back and forth between the High Court and the Supreme Court for appeals and retrials; however Cheng Hsing-tse’s death sentence was finalized on 25 May 2006. His lawyers have since applied for extraordinary appeals but the requests have been rejected each time by the Prosecutor General.

The recently founded Taiwan Innocence Project has taken on the case.  They believe that a confession that was made was obtained through torture, and have filed perjury charges against two police officers for lying about that in testimony.  The defendant has recanted the confession.  The crime scene investigation was completely botched by the police – the guns were not left in place and were collected, and the bodies were moved.  There was also a bogus ballistics analysis done, which has been confirmed as such by a US firearms expert.  However, despite their efforts, the Minister of Justice could sign an execution order at any moment.

Here is the call by Amnesty International for petitions to be submitted to the Taiwanese government:  asa380062012en

Thursday’s Quick Clicks…

  • clickCalifornia Supreme Court holds that, in post-conviction, recantation of an expert based on new scientific advances carries more weight than recantation of a lay witness.  Summary here, decision here
  • A jury in Iowa is still trying to decide whether two Omaha, Neb., men should be paid millions of dollars for spending 25 years in prison on murder convictions later overturned.Jurors began deliberating Friday afternoon after 21 days in the courtroom. They spent eight hours Monday and six hours Tuesday working on the case.  They must decide whether Terry Harrington and Curtis McGhee should be paid by the city of Council Bluffs and two retired police officers who worked to convict them in 1978.

Friday’s Quick Clicks…

  • clickCalifornia Supreme Court upholds murder conviction despite flawed forensics in the form of bite mark evidence
  • The wrongful conviction of Leo Frank in Georgia in 1913 and antisemitism
  • Texas exoneree James C. Williams would like an apology from the rape victim who incorrectly identified him

Katie Couric to Interview Audrey Edmunds and Keith Findley – Shaken Baby Syndrome

Audrey & Keith

Even casual followers of the SBS saga are familiar with the Audrey Edmunds case. Audrey was convicted and imprisoned for the shaking death of an infant in her care.  She spent 11 years in a maximum security prison until Keith Findley and the Wisconsin Innocence Project succeeded in having her conviction overturned, and she was exonerated.

The American Bar Association Journal from Dec., 2011 has an article that provides a good summary of the case.  See that article here.  The article will also give you some idea of how entrenched SBS theory is in the US medical community and justice system.  For example, to this day, the prosecutor in the case is still convinced that Audrey murdered that infant.

On Dec. 10, 2012, Audrey and Keith are scheduled to appear on the daytime talk show “Katie” with Katie Couric.  3:00 PM Eastern time on ABC.  This should be one to put on your calendar.  The appearance was originally scheduled for Dec. 6, but pending any further schedule change, it is now set for Dec. 10.

Wensday’s Quick Clicks…

Friday Quick Clicks…

California Supreme Court Facing Flawed Forensics…

From the LATimes.com:

Police suspected that William Richards had killed his wife, Pamela, the night her body was found.

There was no sign of an intruder, and police said the crime scene appeared staged. But Richards denied killing Pamela, and authorities had trouble obtaining a conviction.

After two juries hung, a third heard new evidence: A forensic odontologist testified that a “bite mark” on Pamela’s hand was consistent with Richards’ unusual dentition, a pattern the prosecution expert said was found in only about 2% of the population. That jury convicted, and a judge sentenced Richards to 25 years to life.

Ten years after the conviction, the prosecution odontologist recanted his testimony. Relying on new computer technology that made it possible to view the “bite mark” more clearly, the odontologist ruled out Richards as its source.

The California Supreme Court is now weighing his case, wrangling over what to do when forensic evidence is later discredited. A broad ruling could affect scores of criminal convictions. A narrow one would offer little hope to those convicted at least in part by so-called junk science.

“A lot of forensic science is not well validated to begin with, and that especially includes bite mark evidence,” said Hastings Law School professor David L. Faigman, an expert on scientific evidence. He said the court could rule for Richards but limit the kinds of cases that would be affected. If discredited science alone became grounds for a retrial, he said, “then you are potentially opening up the floodgates.”

The case against Richards, 63, was largely circumstantial. Richards said he discovered his wife’s body after returning home from work shortly before midnight Aug. 10, 1993. But the sandy, sagebrush-pocked land around their remote, high desert home in San Bernardino County contained no unknown tire tracks or footprints. Nothing had been stolen.

Although Pamela was found naked from the waist down, blood splatter on her Continue reading