Yet more bad news from the UK on exoneree compensation

As several of my blog posts have pointed out (here…. and here….  and here…), seeking compensation for a wrongful conviction in the UK is becoming nigh on impossible. Recent decisions to severely restrict compensation to only those who can demonstrate ‘innocence’ is now set to be enshrined in legislation. This is being done without any fanfare, media attention, or political debate. Academic expert Dr. Hannah Quirk from the University of Manchester is trying to highlight the new provisions that will forever restrict compensation (to the point where I can barely see how anyone will qualify for compensation) for exonerees. Quirk has just had a letter published on this issue in The Times newspaper. Mr Murdoch keeps this behind a ‘paywall’, so it cannot be viewed without payment, so I have reproduced the text of the letter here:


“Tucked away in the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013-14 is a provision to restrict compensation for miscarriages of justice to cases in which “if, and only if the new or newly discovered fact shows beyond reasonable doubt that the person was innocent of the offence.” (s.143) There is no mention of this in the preamble to the Bill and only a brief reference from Theresa May (the Home Secretary) during the Bill’s second reading. Eligibility is already very restrictive since the previous government ended the ex gratia scheme. Very few successful appellants are able to establish their innocence (which is why the Court of Appeal considers the ‘safety’ of a conviction). Under this test, the Guildford Four, notwithstanding an apology from the Prime Minister for the grievous wrong they had suffered, would not have been entitled to compensation. It is not clear that this provision complies with our international obligations. When the ICCPR was drafted, every proposal that compensation should be restricted to the innocent was rejected. The European Court of Human Rights has said that the existing provisions do not infringe Article 6 (Allen v UK) noting specifically that the appellant was not obligated to demonstrate her innocence. Finally, a small but significant number of successful appellants do not know on what basis their conviction has been quashed. These could be cases relating to undercover policing or collusion – areas in which the State may have directly contributed to or caused the miscarriage of justice. It is hard to see how the decision-making process regarding compensation in these cases could possibly be regarded as fair”.

Dr Hannah Quirk, University of Manchester.

2 responses to “Yet more bad news from the UK on exoneree compensation

  1. ‘Not Innocent enough’ I am innocent and have witnesses to prove it but I cant find a lawyer to take my case on.
    What most people will ever realise apart from the unfortunate few is the ferocity of power and ignorant spite that the police display when doing those early morning raids and the subsequent days, months and in some cases years of horror. Being dragged from your ‘safe home’ in the early hours is frightening enough, but then to be politically played with is disgusting and after they clearly make a mistake to use an excuse like ‘not innocent enough’ is an insult to our human rights.

    I was arrested for Murder in November 2011, interrogated for three days, 22 hours of questions over the fact that my late wife some 7 years previously had fallen from a cliff in India and died.

    My home was ransacked, my businesses closed down, I was held in custody for 18 months. There was never any evidence that a crime had been committed but after the police had started their investigation there was no going back for them in that every day they spent more money flying teams of police officers to India, interviewing over 260 people, spending millions trying to justify the case that they had started. Then in March this year they admitted they had been approached by two witnesses who had seen the accident and dropped all charges against me and released me from prison. No apology, no compensation, you can’t sue the CPS and trying to find one of those big city law firms to sue the police is imposible.

    I used to be proud to say I am a British citizen, I am ashamed now to admit that I am part of a society that is all too quick to blame, is all too quick to destroy your life and that of your family and is totally unaccountable for their actions.

  2. Pingback: Strict UK compensation rules for exonerees soon to be passed | Wrongful Convictions Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s