Good news from http://www.popsci.com:
After years of reports of troubled crime labs, the U.S. Department of Justice is putting together a commission that will set standards, a professional code and education requirements for forensic scientists.
The U.S. Department of Justice is looking for a little outside help standardizing the science that puts some people behind bars and sets others free. The department, along with a U.S. science body, is putting together a National Commission on Forensic Science, the agencies announced recently.
The commission will create a professional code for forensic scientists, set certification requirements and advise the Attorney General, the announcement said. In addition, the National Institute of Standards and Technology will double-check existing forensic science standards and develop new ways of making forensic measurements.
The announcement follows nationwide discoveries of sloppily run crime labs. It also comes after years of evidence that many forensic-science techniques need dramatic improvement and sometimes send innocent people to prison–or worse.
When we say years of evidence, we mean years. In 2009, the National Research Council reported that forensic science needed stronger standards. For some forensic techniques, for example, there’s no single standard for what constitutes a match between crime-scene evidence and the control; instead, interpretations vary from lab to lab.
That same year, the nonprofit Innocence Project published research that suggested 45 percent of wrongful convictions stemmed from faulty forensics. (Another report, by the former director of forensic sciences for the Michigan State Police, says the figure is more like 11 percent.)
The National Research Council report suggested the U.S. form a national institute just for forensic science. The new commission will perform many of the functions the research council suggested.
The commission will have about 30 people, including forensic scientists, academic scientists, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges. The National Register will publish a notice asking people to apply for membership.



I just have to say Bravo, Bravo, Bravo! But considering the NAS report was published in 2009, what took ’em so long?!
“… what took ‘em so long?!”
Possibly because no child or gr.child of the AG was convicted & imprisoned using junk science !
This is a workable plan, however the problem originates from within this group who are lacking in oversight and usually make their own rules. The victims who are most affected by the actions of this group of multi-qualified/unqwualified ‘experts’ remain without a voice in the oversight of these often elected, or appointed politicians
One might want to start with the DEA labs which literally claim infallible analysts and tests for controlled substances. Police departments also now claim infallibility. Voluminous documentation provided upon request.
John Kelly kjohn39679@aol.com 202-328-0178
Barry Logan, the new president of AAFS has been implicated in more than 10,000 fraudulent cases by no fewer than 7 judges as well as massive evidence compiled by Ted Vosk. Logan is now selecting members of the new commission.