We’ve reported about Jack McCullough on this blog several times previously. See here, here, here, and here.
Prior to having his conviction overturned and being exonerated, this case was touted as the “oldest cold case ever solved.”
It will be interesting to see where this suit goes, since prosecutors are supposed to have absolute immunity to civil suit for actions taken while pursuing their duties as prosecutor. They can, however, be held responsible for criminal actions.
See the CNN story here.
Arizona’s justice system is truly something to behold. After all, it’s the home of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. And get this – Arizona’s Attorney General and Maricopa County’s Attorney have publicly stated that there are “no” wrongful convictions and “no” Brady violations in Arizona. Really?! Arizon Bradypdf
But here’s one for the books. Arizona actually has a law that says anyone who knowingly and intentionally touches a child’s genitals is guilty of child molestation – without a requirement of sexual intent. So anyone who changes a child’s diaper or bathes a child can be charged with child molestation. All it takes is a vindictive spouse or partner, or even just a casual witness (eg: changing a baby’s diaper in a public restroom) to make a charge. And as you certainly would guess, numerous innocent parents and caregivers have been ensnared by this law.
When the Arizona legislature wrote and passed the law, they specifically removed the requirement for sexual intent. The governor signed it, and the Arizona Supreme Court upheld it.
Recently Federal District Judge Neil V. Wake, in a testy opinion, ruled the law unconstitutional. See that ruling here. Thank goodness sanity has prevailed. Hopefully this will eventually lead to relief for all those wrongfully imprisoned by this bogus statute.
Last week Judge Wake also overturned the conviction of Stephen May, a school teacher and swim instructor, who was convicted largely based upon this law’s definition of child molestation. See the article by Jacob Sullum on Reason.com here.
See the story by Mark Joseph Stern writing for Slate here.
Posted in Compensation/Exoneree compensation, Post-conviction relief, Reforming/Improving the system, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged compensation, Criminal Justice Reform, FOIA, Freedom of Information Act, Keith Allen Harward, Mary Elizabeth Morgan, Nolan Klein, official misconduct, Ralph Armstrong, Robert Ferguson, The marshall project, wrongful conviction
Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald, the former Green Beret surgeon who was first cleared in the murders of his pregnant wife and two daughters and then convicted in 1970, will have what may be his final chance at overturning his conviction after spending the past 36 years in prison for a crime that many experts now believe he did not commit. Oral arguments before a federal appeals court will commence on January 26. The crime took place prior to the use of DNA analysis and new DNA evidence and a lot of other evidence, including evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, flawed forensic testimony, and botched crime scene analysis, provides powerful support for his story that intruders killed his family in what was in some ways similar to the “Manson family” murders in that same era. People Magazine investigative reports will culminate in its major cover story, available on newsstands on Friday, January 20. Here is a link to the People Magazine digital story today that precedes the cover story:
Former Green Beret Surgeon Jeffrey MacDonald Says There’s Evidence He Didn’t Kill His Family: ‘I Am Innocent’
Posted in Compensation/Exoneree compensation, Exonerations, Post-conviction relief, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction, Wrongfully Convicted Women
Tagged compensation, compensation bill, Kentucky Innocence Project, Raymond Lee Jennings, Tim Cole, Tim Cole Commission, William Carini, William Virgil, wrongful conviction
The year 2016 will go down as a good one for Freddie Peacock. But because it was so long in coming, it surely must be bittersweet. His story illustrates the slow pace and enormous hurdles in correcting criminal justice miscarriages post-conviction. It also calls on our individual and national conscience to make 2017 the year responsible citizens send the message loud and clear to all public and criminal justice professionals that this nation must replace the mantra of “tough on crime” with “smart on crime.” In the Peacock case we learn many lessons about wrongful conviction rarely delivered so clearly by a federal judge.
In August 2016 U.S. District Judge Michael Telesca awarded Freddie Peacock nearly $6.2 million long after Peacock’s conviction of and imprisonment for a 1976 Rochester (NY) rape he didn’t commit. Peacock had sued the city of Rochester and Rochester police. Judge Telesca’s decisions in May (here) enabling Peacock to pursue civil damages and in August (here) determining his damages are instructional for those who believe wrongful convictions are the inevitable rare result of innocent human error. Continue reading
Posted in Compensation/Exoneree compensation, Conviction Integrity Units, Editorials/Opinion, Exonerations, forensic science, Junk science, New Evidence, Police conduct (good and bad), Post-conviction relief, Prosecutorial conduct (good and bad), Reforming/Improving the system, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged compensation, Conviction Integrity Unit, DNA testing, forensic science, wrongful conviction
Posted in Exonerations, Eyewitness identification, New Evidence, Post-conviction relief, Uncategorized
Tagged Brendan Dassey, capital punishment, compensation, Conviction Integrity Unit, eyewitness identification, eyewitness reliability, Making a Murderer, Mike Hansen, Richard Rosario
Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno was remembered for many things after her death this week. But one of her most important accomplishments was greatly overlooked — how she fostered the innocence movement. Defense attorney James M. Doyle explains how in a column here.
Posted in Post-conviction relief, Uncategorized
Tagged Arson, arson forensic science, Bill Glaze, Bill Richards, Brady Violation, forensic science, Michele Yezzo, Minnesota Innocence Project, Ohio Innocence Project, prosecutorial misconduct, Sue Neill-Fraser, wrongful conviction
Posted in Capital punishment, Exonerations, Post-conviction relief, Project Spotlights, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged Beatrice Six, Brian T Cooper, capital punishment, Death Penalty, jailhouse snitch, Lamonte McIntyre, new trial, Post-conviction relief, University of Buffalo, wrongful conviction
Posted in Access to DNA testing, Post-conviction relief, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction, Wrongfully Convicted Women
Tagged After Innocence, Amanda Knox, DNA, DNE Evidence, life after exoneration, Martin Tankleff, Post-conviction relief, wrongful conviction
Michael Hannon was accused of sexual assault by a 10 year old neighbour, in 1997. He was convicted and yet in 2006, his accuser came forward and retracted her statement, confessing that she had made a false allegation. Despite this, the Ministry of Justice ‘lost’ Hannon’s case files. It was not until 2009 that he was able to have his case certified as a miscarriage of justice. The Ministry and Hannon have now reached an out-of-court settlement after his claim for compensation went to the High Court. The case is a stark example of what can happen when police pursue allegations in spite of a total lack of evidence. This failure was compounded by incompetence on behalf of the prosecutors and Ministry of Justice staff who not only ‘lost’ his file for 15 months, but continued to protest against his case being declared a miscarriage of justice.
Mr Hannon has thanked his family and supporters but spoke of the need for an inquiry into the actions of the Ministry, and why the retraction by the complainant was not forwarded to him or his legal team. He said that it is ‘impossible to summarise the impact of a wrongful conviction upon a person.”
Read more here:
Two Decades On…. Closure for Connemarra Neighbour falsely convicted of child sex abuse