Justin Brooks
Professor, California Western School of Law; Director,
California Innocence ProjectOrder his book
Wrongful Convictions Cases & Materials 2d ed. here
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore
Daniel Ehighalua
Nigerian Barrister
Associate Professor of Justice Studies, Montclair University
Carey D. Hoffman
Director of Digital Communications,
Ohio Innocence Project@OIPCommunicati1
Shiyuan Huang
Associate Professor, Shandong University Law School; Visiting Scholar, University of Cincinnati College of Law
Professor of Criminology, Law & Society and Sociology, University of California-Irvine
Phil Locke
Science and Technology Advisor, Ohio Innocence Project and Duke Law Wrongful Convictions Clinic
Dr. Carole McCartney
Reader in Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Northumbria University
Nancy Petro
Author and Advocate
Order her book
False Justice here
Professor, Faculty of Law, Konan University Innocence Project Japan
Professor, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona University; Executive Director, Arizona Innocence Project
Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway
Author and Private Investigator
Order his book
Presumed Guilty here
Order Here
Wrongful Convictions Blog 
I am thrilled by efforts to apply quality control principles to the justice system.
Please see our previous post on the subject: https://wrongfulconvictionsblog.org/2012/07/02/rate-of-wrongful-convictions-you-cant-improve-what-you-dont-measure-six-sigma-and-the-us-justice-system-2/
This current article talks about a method of reviewing mistakes involving all “stake holders” in the process that went wrong. This is fine if all participants are open to the findings of the review. But what if the mistake was caused by a Brady violation? Do we really think the prosecutors are going to change voluntarily? The only things that are going to change the prosecutors are accountability and sanctions.