Category Archives: Editorials/Opinion

The Passing of a Forgotten (Wrongfully Convicted) Man

George Whitmore Jr. “never saw himself as a race activist. In the 1960’s and 1970’s, from prison and on the streets, he watched the civil rights movement and the Black Power Movement at a wary distance. He did not judge people by the their skin color. He knew he had been the victim of a grave injustice, but he did not assume that the detectives who framed him, or his slow torture at the hands of a rigged system, were motivated by racial prejudice.” Thus writes, T.J. English in his New York Times piece (here), “Who Will Mourn George Whitmore?”

According to English—who befriended Whitmore and has written The Savage City: Race, Murder, and a Generation on the Edge about Whitmore and his times—in April, 1964, Whitmore, at 19 years old, was picked up by New York City detectives and interrogated for 22-hours before signing a confession to Continue reading

Prosecutorial Misconduct Forum Engages a Prosecutor and a Man Wrongfully Convicted

Yesterday the Northern California Innocence Project (NCIP) held it’s fifth panel discussion on prosecutorial misconduct, this time at Santa Clara University. Unlike the previous four, the local district attorney, Jeff Rosen, accepted the NCIP’s invitation to participate.

According to the Mercury News (Silicon Valley, CA) here, Rosen “was elected on a promise to reform the office’s win-at-all-costs culture after a series of scandals.” He has re-established the office’s Conviction Integrity unit. While acknowledging that some prosecutorial misconduct is “egregious,” he expressed his belief that prosecutorial error is primarily “unintentional, not malicious.”

Also attending was Obie Anthony, who served 17 years in prison before a judge overturned his murder conviction. The judge noted prosecutorial misconduct in utilizing the key piece of evidence against Anthony, testimony of a pimp, and concealing the deal the prosecutor had made with him. Anthony essentially urged Rosen to be alert to criticisms as “notice” that someone in his office is committing misconduct. “You just need to be accountable,” Anthony said.

NCIP executive director Kathleen “Cookie” Ridolfi reported that a third of the misconduct cases from 1997 through 2011 involved “repeat-offender prosecutors.”

“A group of bad actors are dragging down the reputation of prosecutors, and we have a system that protects them,” she said.

The NCIP’s annual report counted 92 cases of alleged prosecutorial misconduct reaching state and federal courts in California alone, of which the courts set aside the conviction or sentence, barred evidence or declared a mistrial in ten.  To put misconduct statistics in perspective, Ridolfi noted that 97 percent of criminal cases end in plea bargains. Since judges review primarily cases that have gone to trial, the vast majority of criminal cases rarely receive subsequent judicial review…and this opportunity for discovery of prosecutorial misconduct.

A webcast of the forum may be viewed here.

 

New York Bar Association Advocates Videotaped Interrogations, Again

Thank you, Seymour W. James Jr., President of the New York State Bar Association for your Oct. 1 Letter to the Editor of The New York Times (here) supporting videotaping of custodial police interrogations, widely recommended as a best practice that can reduce false confessions. As you noted, since 2004, the NY State Bar Association “has supported mandatory videotaping legislation and has sponsored successful pilot programs.” The legislation has been introduced repeatedly but failed passage again in the last session of the New York Legislature.

With Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s pledge to support NY City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly’s decision to voluntarily record interrogations in serious crimes, this important legislation may be more likely to pass for Continue reading

Understanding the Unthinkable: False Confession

According to Rob Warden, of 70 wrongful convictions in Cook County, Illinois, between 1986 and 2011, a false confession was involved in more than half, including both those who falsely confessed to a crime they did not commit and those implicated by another person’s false confession. Warden should know. Co-founder and executive director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern Law, he’s an award-winning legal affairs journalist, whose efforts to expose official misconduct—physical abuse in interrogations in Illinois—resulted in a more complete understanding of the phenomenon of false confession.

Warden’s 11-minute TEDx video (here) is a primer on why false confessions occur and how the criminal justice system can reduce them.

Warden notes that physical torture does not account for the majority of false confessions today. Most are the result of psychological pressures that could prompt many reading this article to confess to a crime not committed. Continue reading

False confessions continue to taint justice system

The recent exoneration of Damon Thibodeaux in Louisiana and overturned conviction of Richard Lapointe in Connecticut are two new reminders of the devastating effects of false confessions induced by overzealous interrogators.

Thibodeaux was sentenced to death and spent 15 years in prison for the murder of his half-cousin before his exoneration by DNA testing on September 28. Lapointe, a mentally disabled dishwasher convicted of murder in 1989 was granted a new trial on On October 1. Both men claimed they were manipulated into falsely confessing to the crimes.

You can read about Thibodeaux’s exoneration — the 300th achieved by DNA testing —here and here.

While Thibodeaux is now a free man, Lapointe still faces the possibility of a new trial. The state’s top appeals court only ruled that prosecutors had denied him access to notes by a police detective that tend to support his alibi defense. But longtime innocence advocate Donald S. Connery makes a compelling case of Lapointe’s innocence in this opinion column.

Forensic psychologist Karen Franklin gives an excellent explanation of how a false confession “contaminates everything and everyone in touches — from the prosecutor, the judge, and even the suspect’s own attorney” on her informative blog here.

Nigeria: The Shame of a Nation!

The recent barbaric, brutal and gruesome ‘murder’ of 4 University of Port Harcourt students in Nigeria has left majority of Nigerians in shock and dismay. Attached is a video excerpt of the incident. Readers’ discretion is strongly advised, as some of the actions therein are very upsetting, and in some cases too gruesome.http://www.naijaurban.com/video-of-the-4-uniport-students-burnt-alive-for-stealling-phones-and-laptops/  

The incident has been roundly condemned, but it brings to the fore, the nagging questions of: the quality of justice; the level of trust and (dis)belief in the justice system; what the police should be doing and how communities should collectively deal with such outbursts of irrational emotions. As one commentator rightly stated, the genocide in Rwanda started with such piecemeal actions, before it spiralled into a national conflagration.

 The blame must be laid squarely at the door steps of the police. The incident lasted for hours. Where was the police? Agreed the actions of the mob – very few of them if you watch the video clip -were evilly motivated, the intervention of the police would have saved the lives of the students. I don’t buy into the idea of lack of equipment, logistics et al, this was a clear case of a vengenful group of people prepared to take the law into their own hands.

The response of the police was not only shoddy, it was unprofessional, but typical. It shows why the average Nigerian remain lukewarm, unfriendly and hostile to the police. That said, it does not excuse the stone age response of the mob, resorting to jungle justice or self help. Nigerians are increasingly resorting to self-help. I blogged recently about this growing and strange phenomenon. Read here https://wrongfulconvictionsblog.org/2012/06/29/nigeria-trading-justice-for-self-help/    

We can only hope that this incident will be investigated by the authorities and they should get to the bottom of the immediate and remote causes of the Port Harcourt incident. A larger remit of the enquiry should seek to understand why Nigerians look down and undermine the police; the nature of the Nigerian police as an institution, its structure and effectiveness. And of course, a conversation about the latest weasel words – the desireability of state or community police. Above all, the perpetrators must be found and made an example of!

Three Sequential Errors Red Flag Wrongful Convictions

Three recurring contributors to wrongful conviction are the subject of a Pacific Standard article (here) based on a paper (here) by Steven Drizin, co-founder of the Center on Wrongful Convictions for Youth and Richard Leo, a noted social psychologist.

The first of these sequential errors is the selection of an innocent person as the (often sole) guilty suspect. The second, “coercion error” is pursuing “a guilt-presumptive, accusatory interrogation that invariably involves lies about Continue reading

Prosecutors to Prosecutors: Implement a Conviction Integrity Program

“Prosecutors can and should be leading the charge to ensure that the public has confidence that criminal convictions are of the guilty, not the innocent.” This truism comes from a new report, “Establishing Conviction Integrity Programs in Prosecutors’ Office” that is notable not only because it offers a blueprint to improve every prosecutorial office in the country, but also because most making the recommendations are former or current prosecutors themselves.

A product of NYU Law’s Center on the Administration of Criminal Law (the Conviction Integrity Project), the report (here) provides a template for reforms Continue reading

NYPD Will Apply Grant to Identify, Catalog DNA Evidence

Eight hundred persons convicted in New York City are seeking to prove their innocence through DNA testing. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to locate evidence in the city’s massive evidence storage facility. Now those who are actually innocent in this group have new hope. The National Institute of Justice has granted $1.2 million to enable the New York Police Department to dedicate a new staff person to search for sexual assault and homicide cases so that the evidence can be reclassified and assigned a bar code—making the evidence more readily available. Some DNA testing will also be covered by the grant, which will begin on October 1, 2012.

As reported in The New York Times (here) the funds will be applied in a highly efficient manner “because they will be utilizing infrastructure and expertise already in place. The cataloguing system for the evidence will utilize the NYPD’s recently modernized evidence tracking system.” A “new Innocence Project staff person will expedite innocence claims”…and “the Chief Medical Examiner has agreed to donate all staff time for the DNA testing.” Continue reading

New York City Police Won’t Wait for Legislature to Videotape Interrogations

New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly announced last week that the department will begin a policy of videotaping custodial interrogations in murder, serious sex crimes, and felony assault cases. This comes after the New York State Legislature failed to pass legislation requiring videotaping statewide, as recommended by a task force created by Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the Court of New York. The New York Times praised the initiative in an editorial yesterday (here).

Commissioner Kelly noted a benefit that is becoming a factor for professionals in the criminal justice system, namely, that videotaping interrogations can “enhance public confidence in the criminal justice system by increasing transparency as to what was said and done.”

A Case of Short Cuts: Innocence Matters Expects Client’s Release Monday

John Edward Smith, 38, is expected to be released after serving 19 years in prison Monday afternoon. Prosecutors are not expected to oppose Smith’s petition for release in the hearing before a California Superior Court judge. Smith has been represented by pro bono attorneys from Innocence Matters (here). Attorney Deirdre O’Connor formed the group after becoming convinced Smith was innocent of the 1993 drive-by shooting in Los Angeles that killed one man and injured another.

Smith was convicted on the testimony of a sole witness, who has recanted. “I never got a good enough look to ever make an ID of the shooter,” Landu Continue reading

After Four Years of Confinement, Wrongfully Convicted Man is Free

In all, 22-year-old Maligie Conteh, who immigrated to the United States from Sierra Leone at age 3, spent more than four years in prison: 17 months after a wrongful conviction of a $150-dollar robbery, and the remainder at an immigration detention facility in Porstmouth, Va., where he awaited deportation to Sierra Leone due to the conviction. Continue reading

Anniversary of Troy Davis Execution Prompts Discourse

Tomorrow, September 21, is the one-year anniversary of the controversial execution of Troy Davis in Georgia. (See report from a year ago here.) Since 1989 DNA has revealed that wrongful conviction—the conviction of a person totally innocent of the crime—does happen, and more frequently than most Americans believe. That reality begs the question of whether or not an innocent person has been executed in the United States. Troy Davis’s execution elevated this question Continue reading

Jeffrey MacDonald Case: Fatal Vision or Tunnel Vision?

The case of Jeffrey MacDonald, 68, the former Green Beret captain and medical doctor who was convicted of the 1970 murders of his wife and daughters, is getting some important second looks.

See earlier references to the case on the wrongful convictions blog by Martin Yant (here) and Phil Locke (here).

MacDonald, who has now served 30 years in prison, has always claimed innocence. Many know the case through Joe McGinness’s book “Fatal Vision.” A new Continue reading

The Gambia: At Last, Reprieve of Some Sorts

I blogged recently in a post entitled: Bloody August in The Gambia. Then, there were confirmed indications that The Gambia intended to proceed with further ‘executions’ of death row inmates. In Nigeria, an application was already lodged with the ECOWAS court to determine amongst others, the legality of the action itself and the proposed future plans to carry out further ‘executions’. This drew the ire of the international human rights community. The condemnation was almost total. Now, it appears a halt has been put to further executions being carried out. Read BBC News report here

Whilst this is cheering news of some sorts, reading between the lines of the news report, you get the sense that this has only been suspended, or put in abeyance because of the hue and cry that attended the earlier execution of the 9 death row inmates. For now, this is no more than a window of opportunity to unmask and lift the veil on the Gambia legal system to study the delivery and effectiveness of the justice sector and judicial administration; providing opportunity also for policy, legal and regulatory reforms.

Due legal process and respect for fundamental human rights, remains the surest safeguard to avoid miscarriages of justice; and the possibilities of the innocent being sent to the gallows for offenses they either did not commit, or the police did not properly investigate.

LAPD Chief’s Opposition to Line-up Reform Should Prompt Public Pressure

The Los Angeles Times published an opinion today by Barry Scheck, co-director, and Karen A. Newirth, litigation fellow, of the Innocence Project, that underscores why L.A. Police Chief Charlie Beck is wrong in opposing adoption of the best practice of blind administration in police lineups.

The misidentification of an innocent person as the perpetrator has contributed in nearly 75 percent of DNA-proven wrongful convictions. Brandon Garrett notes in his book Convicting the Innocent – Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong a less-known, revealing statistic: Among DNA-proven wrongful convictions in which misidentification was a factor, 36 percent of those misidentified were fingered by more than one witness. This supports what Continue reading

Bloody August in The Gambia!

The Gambia is a small West African country. It was colonized by the British. You would naturally expect the people to be inheritors of the British common law traditions of justice, equity and fairness. Ironically, The Gambia is headquarters to several human rights, regional and continental organizations. The Gambia president’s disdain for the rule of law is legendary.

Torture, unlawful detention of journalists and extra-judicial killings has been the hallmark of his administration since taking over power in a 1994 coup. Even so, the execution of 9 death row inmates last month took the human rights record of The Gambia, and Jammeh’s presidency to an all time  low. Read report in the Nigerian guardian here.  This is in a country where common law principles and Islamic practises intertwine.

It is yet unclear the level of judicial transparency, fairness and justice that the ‘executed’ inmates were exposed to, or provided in the course of their trials. What is certain however, is that, The Gambian judiciary is not entirely as independent as it should be. We do not yet know the extent the inmates were granted due processes. If the recent application lodged with the ECOWAS court of justice on behalf of 2 Nigerians, being amongst  the remainder 48 inmates slated for execution, is anything to go by, then the appeal process in The Gambia leaves much to be desired.

There is everything wrong with a system that produces such skewed outcomes, preceding the denial of basic rights of innocence, fair trial before an independent judiciary; rights of appeal and to legal representation; right to seek all legitimate avenues of redress when those avenues are yet to be exhausted. The Gambia is a member of the ECOWAS commission and is bound by the decisions of the ECOWAS court; even though with a very poor record of compliance with judgements of the court.

The application by the 2 Nigerians before the ECOWAS court will test the court’s jurisdictional capacity with respect to domestic criminal matters, as well as, the extent to which The Gambia government is prepared to flout and undermine the international community. Read report entitled: The Gambia sued over Execution of Nigerianhttp://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/the-gambia-sued-over-execution-of-nigerians/124840/

The international community is waiting and watching patiently as to the outcome of the threat to proceed with the ‘execution’ of the remainder inmates on death row.

Wrongfully Imprisoned Man Waits For Missouri to Step Up

Johnny Briscoe spent 23 years in prison for a 1982 rape he didn’t commit, but, so far, according to the Innocence Project here, he hasn’t collected a dime in compensation from the state of Missouri. He claimed innocence and had an alibi, but the jury believed the victim who had a long look at her attacker in good lighting. She identified Briscoe with confidence within hours of the crime. A forensic expert also made the highly questionable claim that Briscoe’s hair was consistent with a hair found at the scene. Briscoe was convicted at age 29 and sentenced to 45 years.

Large settlements to the wrongfully convicted make headlines. Stories like Johnny Briscoe’s are seldom reported. Continue reading

Prosecutor’s Viewpoint Shouldn’t Obscure: We Can Do Better

Yesterday, Mark Godsey posted on a commentary written by Erie County (NY) District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III and published here in the BuffaloNews.com. It has drawn considerable commentary from those who read this blog. However, for persons uneducated on the subject of wrongful conviction, the prosecutor’s viewpoint might serve to downplay concerns about miscarriages of justice and discourage the public from supporting criminal justice reforms. That would be a shame.

Mr. Sedita’s commentary plays on the universal fear of crime and criminals. The tide of public concern has been turning, however, Continue reading

An MRI Polygraph ?? Beware

Over the past few years, some researchers have been looking at the possibility that an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) brain scan can reveal whether or not someone is lying.  In experiments, subjects are instructed to lie about certain things while an MRI monitors their brain activity.  When the subject lies, the researchers look for differences in the patterns of brain activity.  They have observed ‘differences’ when a subject is lying as opposed to when the subject is telling the truth.

Here are two recent articles on the subject:

…….. From yesterday’s Washington Post    Laris M. MRI polygraphy. Wash Post, 2012-08-26

…….. From the August, 2010 IEEE Spectrum (the official publication of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers)    MRI Polygraph

There is even a company called No Lie MRI that is trying to commercialize the phenomenon.    http://noliemri.com/

Now, let me comment on these developments from the standpoint of the scientific method, design of experiments, and logic.  These “experiments” are nothing more than observational studies.  The experiment may have a hypothesis, that is, when the subject “lies” we’ll see differences in brain activity, which, in the experiment, would be the “dependent variable”.  However, this is very non-specific.  What areas of the brain?  What kind of activity?  What extent of activity?  What level of activity indicates a “lie” over a statistically significant population of subjects of representative ages, races, genders, IQ’s, and physical & mental health?  And the most glaring shortcoming of these experiments is lack of control over independent variables.  A properly designed experiment should have a single dependent variable and all independent variables should be controlled.  That is, if the independent variable being measured is “lie or no lie”, all other independent variables must be constant throughout the experiment – age, race, gender, mental and physical health, IQ, amount of sleep, state of mind, …………..

It has already been observed that the MRI can be “fooled” if the subject imagines imperceptibly wiggling a finger or toe while lying.

I fear that we might be seeing yet another forensic junk science in the making.  Conclusions based upon these studies are another example of forensics being driven by anecdotal, observational studies that get pushed through a process of flawed inductive reasoning.  “I’ve seen a hundred roses, and they’re all red; therefore, all roses are red.”  Or, “I’ve never seen anything like that before; therefore, it must be unique.”

So far, this technology also fails the question that most all forensics fail; “Show me the statistically valid data from which I can compute a probability of occurrence.”  And by the way, even “fingerprints” fails this question.

One saving grace of many forensic disciplines is that they can be statistically valid in excluding a suspect from consideration.  I don’t see that MRI scans are legitimate enough to even do that.

Science is in its infancy in terms of truly understanding the functioning of the human brain.  MRI lie detection may some day be legitimate, but my prediction is that it will be decades, if not generations, from now.