We (I) haven’t posted here about forensics for some time, and the pot is long overdue for a stir. This post was triggered by a recent piece in the NY Times – Fix the Flaws in Forensic Science – see that NY Times story here. The Times story was in turn triggered by the recent “announcement” (admission) by the FBI that FBI agents had been giving scientifically unsupportable testimony regarding microscopic hair comparison in thousands of cases for decades.
Because of a belief and fear that much of forensics was flawed, the NAS Report (National Academy of Sciences), Forensic Science in the United States, A Path Forward, was commissioned by Congress in Fall of 2005. The report was published in 2009. The report issued a scathing condemnation of the current state of forensic “science.” It was, of course met, with a firestorm of resistance from the forensic and prosecutorial communities. Regardless, the US Department of Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology announced the joint creation of a National Commission of Forensic Science (NCFS) in 2013 – see previous WCB posts here, and here.
The NCFS did not hold its first meeting until February, 2014. The Commission released its first nine drafts of policy statements for public comment in October, 2014. In January, 2015, it officially adopted three of those statements. The adopted policies are highlighted in the list below:
While this has been going on, the sole federal judge on the commission, Jed Rakoff, resigned just last January in protest over the Justice Department’s position on an issue that would continue to favor prosecutors at the expense of full pretrial evidence exchange. There has since been an accommodation reached, but I suspect this is indicative of the Justice Department’s opposition to truly changing anything. This also causes me to wonder greatly about the objectivity of all the commission members.
Keep in mind also, that the commission is only empowered to make policy recommendations. It has no powers of oversight or enforcement, and no way to administer the adoption of its recommendations. My reading of the “tea leaves” here is that the advocates for the Justice Department and the existing forensic community have successfully kept the commission mired in politics and committees. So … there you have it. Six years after the publication of the NAS Report, a federal commission with no powers has adopted three policy recommendations.
In the meantime, the traditional forensic science community has been motoring along as if the NAS Report never happened. At the most recent American Academy of Forensic Sciences meeting, there was an active session on forensic odontology (bite mark analysis); a discipline for which the NAS Report states there is absolutely no scientific basis.
Do you wonder why I ask, “Will they EVER fix forensics?”
Thanks for reminding readers of how important some level of accreditation is. All it takes is some rogue “expert” who lies his or her way in and the stage is set for wrongful convictions. And they never seem to be defense-friendly – funny how that works.
Phil, Thanks for putting the brute reality out there, not tarnished by spin and the usual rhetoric. How many innocent lives and families have been destroyed while committees met, dined together for years, with no incentive to “right the wrongs” and address meaningful solutions? Those who profit in the “billions of $$$’s” industry that has replaced manufacturing in America, are not about to change a thing, until one day no one is left to pay for it (the growing debt?). This bodes poorly for our children and grandchildren and the legacy left by the “profiteers” in this self-destruction of America, “land of the free”.
Pingback: Another forensic disaster : secret forensic “science”experts allowed to coerce crime suspects into plea deals. | FORENSICS in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends
Pingback: Junk Science Reigns ____ So Much for True Science in the Courtroom | Wrongful Convictions Blog
Pingback: Junk Science Reigns — Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
Pingback: Forensic Science……Junk Science, But Police and Prosecutors Just Don’t Care – ElephantTail