Author Archives: Mark Godsey

Monday’s Quick Clicks…

New Scholarship Spotlight: Social Psychology, Information Processing, and Plea Bargaining

Professor Rebecca E. Hollander-Blumoff has posted the above-titled article on SSRN.  Download here:  Abstract states:

In this essay, I offer new arguments about why the rational actor paradigm in plea bargaining may not capture the reality of negotiation between prosecutor and defense counsel, and why lawyers may not be likely to lessen the effects of cognitive bias and heuristics. As others have acknowledged, cognitive biases and heuristics that interfere with accurate information processing are one threat to a rational economic model of plea bargaining. But modern psychology has recognized that cognitive biases and heuristics do not exist in a vacuum and are not the only systematic predictors of how individuals process information. Rather than suggesting that certain factors act as an impediment to rational decision making, the social psychological approach seeks to explain perception and decision making as a function of myriad individual and social factors.

This essay begins to explore psychological research on how motivation and the effects of social factors can affect information processing to shed light on such processing in the plea bargaining setting. In particular, I consider the effects of two factors, epistemic motivation and group identity and membership, on information processing as it may relate to plea negotiation. I begin by briefly reviewing the literature on how cognitive bias may affect plea bargaining. I then explore how epistemic motivation and group identity and membership affect information processing and the use of biases and heuristics more broadly, looking particularly at potential effects in the plea bargaining setting.

Duke’s Wrongful Conviction Clinic Scores Release, New Trial of Lamonte Armstrong…

From press release:

See news videos here and here….

GREENSBORO, N.C. — A Greensboro man convicted of first-degree murder in 1995 was released from prison Friday after a judge agreed with defense attorneys and a North Carolina assistant district attorney that he should be freed pending a new trial.

LaMonte Armstrong, convicted of the 1988 murder of Ernestine Compton in Greensboro, had served 17 years of a life sentence. He was released by Judge Joseph Turner after defense attorneys David Pishko ’77 and Theresa Newman ’88, a professor at Duke Law School and co-director of the school’s Wrongful Convictions Clinic, presented evidence of his wrongful conviction. Guilford County Assistant District Attorney Howard Neumann joined with Armstrong’s lawyers in recommending his release pending a new trial.

Armstrong’s hearing, originally scheduled for September, was fast-tracked after police uncovered new evidence during a retest of physical evidence from the crime scene.

A team of Duke Law students, many of them now alumni, has been working with Newman, Pishko and Professor James Coleman on Armstrong’s case for years. Their “dogged work,” and the “open minds” of Neumann and Greensboro Police Detective Michael Matthews, resulted in a just outcome, Coleman said.

“The willingness of the Greensboro Police Department and the District Attorney’s office to listen to our concerns and act as amenable, if skeptical, allies in pursuing the truth is a blueprint for how innocence investigations should Continue reading

More details on launch of Philippine Innocence Project…

As I blogged previously, some key people in the Philippines are launching an IP there.  Here are some excepts from the “white paper” concerning founding and organization structure, which could be helpful to those attempting to start innocence organizations around the world:

Brief Description, Rationale and Purposes

The Philippine Innocence Project is a network of law school clinics, scientific and academic laboratories and non-governmental organizations, that seeks to make justice accessible for wrongfully convicted persons.

Wrongful convictions are not new to the Philippines. In 2004, the Philippine Supreme Court released statistics that showed a high judicial error rate of 71.77 % in capital cases (People v. Mateo, GR No. 147678-87, 07 July 2004).

In, among others, recognition of the country’s high judicial error rate and the phenomenon of wrongful convictions, the Supreme Court promulgated the Rule on DNA Evidence (A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC), which allows post-conviction DNA testing without need of prior court order by the prosecution or any person convicted by final and executory judgment where a biological sample exists and the sample is relevant to the case and the testing would probably result in the reversal or modification of the conviction (Section 6).

In order to make justice accessible to wrongfully convicted persons, the Philippine Innocence Project aims specifically to:

• Provide coordinated free legal assistance to persons wrongfully convicted; • Advocate reforms in policies, laws, judicial rules, legal education, and criminal investigative procedures and evidence handling to redress wrongful convictions in the Philippines;

• Enhance the capacities of justice stakeholders including judges, prosecutors, lawyers, criminal and forensic investigators, law students, etc. to eradicate or mitigate wrongful convictions in the country; and • Establish an independent and accurate data bank containing all pertinent information on wrongful convictions in the Philippines.

Functional Relationships and Organizational Structure As a network, the Philippine Innocence Project shall have four main functional components:

1. A central clearinghouse, which shall, among others, receive and screen all applications, assign accepted cases to the law school clinics/legal aid organizations, and provide general support to law school clinics/legal aid organizations;

2. The law school clinics/legal aid organizations, which shall integrate the Philippine Innocence Project in their activities, train their students/volunteers, and handle cases assigned by the central clearinghouse;

3. The DNA and forensic laboratory and experts, which shall undertake DNA and other forensic testing for cases referred by the law school clinics/legal aid organizations; and

4. The public relations and funding team, which shall undertake public relations activities, liaise with the Innocence Network and other international organizations, and secure international support, funds and resources for the Philippine Innocence Project.

As of June 16, 2012, the following entities, in alphabetical order, have agreed to establish the Philippine Innocence Project:

• College of Law, Ateneo de Davao University; • College of Law, De La Salle University; • DNA Analysis Laboratory, NSRI, University of the Philippines; • Free Legal Assistance Group [FLAG]; • Give Up Tomorrow Team; and • Office of Legal Aid, College of Law, University of the Philippines.

The specific functions of each of the participating entities, as well as the central clearing house, are presented in the figure below.

The proposed organizational structure of the Philippine Innocence Project central clearinghouse (see figure below) consists of:

• A Board of Directors, to be composed of representatives of participating entities;

• An Executive Director, to be selected by the Board of Directors;

• A Case Manager, to be hired by the Executive Director, and to be assisted by a Staff Attorney, an Intake and Screening Assistant, and Student Volunteers from the participating law school clinics based in Metro Manila;

• A Research and Training Officer, to be hired by the Executive Director, and to be assisted by a Research Assistant and a Training Assistant;

• A Data and Monitoring Officer, to be hired by the Executive Director, and to be assisted by a Data Processor;

• A Budget and Administrative Officer, to be hired by the Executive Director, and to be assisted by a Bookkeeper, Receptionist/Secretary and Messenger; and

• A Finance Officer, to be hired by the Executive Director, and to be assisted by an Assistant/Secretary.

Summer Newsletter of Innocence Network UK Now Available…

The 40-page newsletter is available here.  The table of contents:

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

THE TRUTH OF EDDIE GILFOYLE BY SUE CADDICK     page 1

PERSPECTIVE OF A FORMER COMMISSIONER ON THE REFORM OF THE CCRC BY DAVID JESSEL    page 5

WHO JUDGES THE CCRC? BY SUSAN MAY   page 12

CAUSES FOR CONCERN: THE INUK’S DOSSIER OF CASES BY GABE TAN   page 17

AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE REFORM OF THE CCRC BY PROFESSOR RICHARD NOBLES   page 21

WHAT DO THE WRONGLY CONVICTED WANT FROM THE CCRC? BY DR ANDREW GREEN    page 28

NEWS   page 34

Thursday’s Quick Clicks…

Exoneration in Canada Yesterday in Child Abuse Case…

Brenda Waudby’s wrongful conviction was due to bad science, undisclosed information, and a false confession (guilty plea).  From mykawartha.com:

(PETERBOROUGH) Standing outside the Water Street courthouse with her lawyer, family and friends by her side, Brenda Waudby is content.
On Wednesday (June 27), Justice Michelle Fuerst ruled that Ms Waudby’s 1999 child abuse conviction would be overturned and ordered that her name be removed from the child abuse registry no later than July 11.
“I feel like this has been the final step,” says an emotional Ms Waudby.
“It is a great relief for me that this finally has come to end an end after 15 years.”
Despite being cleared of murdering her daughter Jenna Mellor in 1997, Ms Waudby has lived more than a decade under the shadow of a conviction of child abuse. She has been fighting to remove this black mark from her record since her daughter’s babysitter was convicted of the toddler’s death in 2006. Wednesday, Justice Fuerst agreed that the best and only reasonable explanation of the injuries to Jenna is that they were all inflicted by the babysitter.
“There was no factual basis for the charge of child abuse or to Ms Waudby’s guilty plea to it. Her guilty plea along with ensuing conviction of child abuse was a miscarriage of justice,” Justice Fuerst told the court.
The judge’s decision was heavily supported by series of new disclosures, including 1999 notes by Peterborough police detective Dan Lemay, a transcript of the confession from Jenna’s killer with an undercover officer, and information that came out in the Goudge Inquiry in 2008, including medical evidence from more than one pathologist that pinpointed all of Jenna’s injuries to the time of when she was in the care of her babysitter. It was disgraced pediatric pathologist Dr. Charles Smith that pinpointed Jenna’s fatal injuries, blunt force trauma to Continue reading

Can Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment Help Us Distinguish between True and False Confessions?

Rinat Kitai-Sangero has posted the above-titled article on SSRN.  Download here.  Abstract states:

Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment is also a story about confessions. Raskolnikov, who committed a double murder, and Nikolay, an innocent suspect, each confesses to the same crime. An analysis of Raskolnikov’s and Nikolay’s confession demonstrates the complexity of motives that drive the guilty and the innocent alike to confess and points to the distinction between true and false confessions. Finally this novel supports the conclusion that the accused should be required to provide significant details of the crime as a requirement for relying on his or her confession.

Australian Man Freed, Murder Conviction Overturned, After Faulty Science Revealed…

From news source:

THE acquittal of Jeffrey Gilham is the latest in a string of decisions that reveals the serious systemic failures in the use of scientific evidence in NSW, one of the country’s top forensic law authorities says.

As further revelations emerged about the failure of prosecutors in the Gilham case to call a key expert witness, Gary Edmond from the University of NSW said the case highlighted the need for radical changes to the way expert evidence was both formulated and presented at trial.

”[Jeffrey] Gilham, [Gordon] Wood … they all reveal serious and systemic problems in the ability of our criminal justice system to credibly engage with Continue reading

A Brooklyn Man Wins a New Trial After 23 Years

From unprison.com:

By Bruce Reilly…

When I woke up this morning, I knew that thousands of innocent prisoners had active cases in the court system.  When I go to sleep, I will know that one man, Derrick Deacon, waited enough time to be vindicated: 23 years.  Yesterday the New York Appellate Division overruled the lower court and decided to give the man a new trial.  Considering the evidence, the Brooklyn District Attorney would be flushing the taxpayers’ money down the drain by pushing to retry him.  This case is in many ways a textbook wrongful conviction, pushed over the top by the Exoneration Initiative.  It is worth looking at the fundamentals of the case, in hopes that someday the District Attorneys will begin admitting their mistakes and punishing government wrongdoers.

The Bad Identification

In this case a young woman identified a 5’7 guy around 19.  When the police brought in a 6 foot, 34 year old man, the police or prosecutors (according to the witness) leaned on her to give a vague description.  She told them it was not Deacon, a man she was not connected to but someone she had known from the Continue reading

Oscar-Nominated Director Working on Documentary Film About Michael Morton Case…

From the Republic:

AUSTIN, Texas — If there is going to be a movie about his wrongful conviction, 25 years in prison and ultimate exoneration, Michael Morton did not want it to begin with the words “Based on a true story.”

PHOTO: FILE - In this March 29, 2012 file photo from Austin, Texas, Michael Morton pauses while speaking to the public for the first time since he was freed from prison after spending nearly 25 years behind bars for a murder he didn't commit.  A documentary feature directed by two-time Academy Award nominee and former Texan Al Reinert,began filming three weeks ago. (AP Photo/Statesman.com, Ralph Barrera, File)  MAGS OUT; NO SALES; INTERNET AND TV MUST CREDIT PHOTOGRAPHER AND STATESMAN.COM

But a documentary feature, particularly one written and directed by two-time Academy Award nominee and former Texan Al Reinert, was something Morton could get behind, and filming began recently.

“Truth is important to me,” he said. “And Al was generous enough to give me a lot of control and truly include me in the way things are done.”

Morton wanted three details to be included in the film: a life-changing conversion experience in prison, a focus on legal-system changes that could prevent future false convictions and an emphasis on his wife, Christine, who was murdered in their Williamson County home in 1986.

“Sometimes my wife gets left out in all the hubbub of me getting out of prison,” he said.

For a quarter-century, only a handful of friends, family and defense lawyers believed Morton did not kill Christine. The case against Morton fell apart last year when new DNA evidence pointed to another suspect and a key piece of forensic evidence — that Christine’s stomach contents pointed to a time of death that implicated only Morton — fell apart under modern scientific scrutiny. He was freed from prison in October.

Filming the documentary began over the Memorial Day weekend in the Georgetown courtroom where Morton was found guilty in 1987.

Morton didn’t expect his return to be a big deal. He was wrong.

“I didn’t think it was haunted or had some kind of evil mojo,” he said. “But actually sitting in there, actually speaking — it was much more emotional than I expected. It really caught me off guard.”

Morton said the overwhelming emotion was one of loss for Christine and his son, Eric, who was 3 when he was arrested and was raised by Christine’s sister.

“We were discussing my wife. They asked me about her, and one of the things pointed out to me is that I never really had time to mourn for her; very soon after Continue reading

Tuesday’s Quick Clicks…

  • Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck takes the stage with Miss America to advocate for prison reform in the U.S.
  • North Carolina’s president of NAACP will speak at rally for the Wilmington 10
  • Mark Alan Norwood of Texas, who is charged for the same murder that wrongfully sent Michael Morton to prison, has his trial moved to a new county
  • California exoneree Brian Banks files for his state statutory compensation of $100 per day of wrongful conviction
  • Supporters of Kirstin Blaise Labato are seeking signatures petitioning the District Attorney to take a different stance than his predecessors and allow DNA testing on evidence, which may shed new light on the case. Jason Kreag, an attorney with the Innocence Project, frames the issue in a letter to District Attorney Steven Wolfson. “My question is simple: what do you have to lose by consenting to testing? If the results confirm Ms. Labato’s involvement in the murder, then that would effectively end the case, and Ms. Labato’s conviction would stand. . . But if the testing identified someone other than Ms. Labato as the murderer, then that result could not only serve as compelling evidence of Ms. Labato’s innocence but also bring the true perpetrator to justice.” 

More Virginia cases of innocence possible

From the TimesDispatch:

Six people have been exonerated in a landmark DNA testing project that started seven years ago and was made possible by biological material discovered in old forensic case files.

Now, officials believe at least four other people may have been wrongfully convicted, and they are taking another look at those cases.

More than three dozen commonwealth’s attorneys received reports in recent years from the Virginia Department of Forensic Science in 78 cases where a convicted person was not identified — or excluded — in DNA testing of the old evidence.

Last month, the prosecutors were notified that unless the DNA reports were critical to an ongoing investigation, they would be subject to public disclosure on July 1. As of last week, the department said it had been asked to withhold four reports.

Some of the 78 exclusions show innocence, many may prove nothing and the significance of others may be arguable. More than a dozen of the 78 people excluded are dead, and an unknown number have not been found.

That leaves the decision on whether to investigate the matter in those cases up to prosecutors, police and living defendants who can be located with no input from Continue reading

Breaking News: Philippines Innocence Project Launched…

The Center has been working to provide support and information to representatives in the Philippines interested in starting an Innocence Network Organization there.  I just got an email announcement from one of the founders, Jaime Syjuco, stating that one had formed in the past week.  Here are some details from the email:

I thought this email beforehand would be opportune to share some good news/progress regarding the startup of the IP Philippines.

Last Saturday June 16, we held the first IP workshop at the University of the Philippines DNA lab. Attending were:

  1. College of Law, Ateneo de Davao University;
  2. College of Law, De La Salle University;
  3. DNA Analysis Laboratory, NSRI, University of the Philippines;
  4. Free Legal Assistance Group [FLAG];
  5. Give Up Tomorrow Team; and
  6. Office of Legal Aid, College of Law, University of the Philippines.

The 6 groups above have agreed to establish the IP Philippines.

It was also discussed that a tie-up with the University of the Philippines’ Film Institute may work towards getting Film Students involved in documenting the work of the IP Philippines….

More details to follow…

Monday’s Quick Clicks…

  • Review of book The Dreyfus Affair, about a famous wrongful conviction in France
  • Jail “damaged” wrongfully convicted mother Lindy Chamberlain, says her former husband
  • Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project’s Young Professionals group to hold a Cocktails and Conversations event on July 10th with the legal team that freed the West Memphis 3 and exonerees Marvin Anderson and Thomas Haynesworth
  • Supporters of Illinois Innocence Project client Pamela Jacobazzi gathered in front of capital building yesterday to ask Illinois governor to grant her clemency on grounds that the “shaken baby syndrome” science used to convict her has proven to be unfounded

Saturday’s Quick Clicks…

  • The Innocence Project offers to pay for DNA testing in the controversial  Kirstin Lobato case in Las Vegas
  • Devil’s Knot, feature film about West Memphis 3, already starring Colin Firth and Reese Witherspoon, adds more to its star-studded cast
  • Video of exoneree Anthony Graves talking about surviving solitary confinement
  • Until death, Texas inmate Larry Sims tried to clear his name
  • Stop, Frisk and DNA sample

Friday’s Quick Clicks…

Wrongful Convictions ‘more frequent’ in Scotland if Crown Office succeed in removal of Scots Law requirement of Corroboration

From the Scottish Law Reporter:

PROSECUTORS at Scotland’s Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) have begun their campaign to lobby Scottish Ministers & the Scottish Parliament to remove one of the checks & balances against miscarriages of justice in Scots law, that ofCorroboration, which currently guarantees that the presentation of important evidence presented in a criminal prosecution is required to be supported by two independent sources.

However, critics point to the fact that Scotland’s prosecutors are generally regarded as very poor in court, with the prosecution service as a whole regarded by legal insiders as more disposed to gaining a conviction at any cost (including the use of ‘dodgy’ evidence) rather than serving the interests of justice.

Coincidentally, the reasons talked about by the Solicitor General, Lesley Thomson who is backing the removal of Corroboration in a media release issued Continue reading

Peter van Koppen on miscarriages of justice: ‘Dutch judges need to be more critical’

From the Amsterdam Herald:

By Peter van Koppen

Until a few years ago the phrase ‘miscarriage of justice’ was rarely heard in the Netherlands. But a handful of high-profile cases have put the country’s justice system under the spotlight and raised questions about how its judges should be judged.

Perhaps the most notorious was the conviction of Lucia de Berk, the nurse jailed in 2004 on seven counts of poisoning hospital patients who died in her care. The case against her was based on the low statistical likelihood of such a large number of deaths occurring naturally.

After being branded for six years as the Netherlands’ worst serial killer, De Berk’s conviction was quashed in 2010 after a re-examination of the evidence found all the deaths could be explained by natural causes.

Later that year another nurse, Ina Post, was cleared after a 23-year fight to overturn her conviction for strangling an 89-year-old woman in her care. Other recent cases include the ‘Putten Two’, wrongly jailed for the rape and murder of a stewardess in a Gelderland village, and Kees B., found guilty of murdering a 10-year-old girl in a park in Schiedam on the basis of a false confession.

The most recent case to come to light, the Breda Six, has a narrative which will be familiar to anyone who has followed miscarriage of justice cases around the world: evidence withheld, confessions made under duress and an investigation that blindly followed a false trail.

In 1993 a 56-year-old grandmother was killed in a Chinese restaurant in the southern city of Breda. She had been strangled and battered with a wok. Whoever killed her also made off with the takings from the restaurant’s gambling Continue reading

FAILED EVIDENCE: Why Law Enforcement Resists Science

Professor David Harris has published a new book with the title above.

From the book’s website:

Failed Evidence: Why Law Enforcement Resists Science (NYU Press) is a direct challenge to police and prosecution leadership that has failed to come to grips with the insights that science has supplied for routine types of traditional police work. We’ve all heard about the DNA-based exonerations of innocent people: almost 300 over the last two decades.  Failed Evidence starts with this topic, but pushes further.  There is now plenty of science about the basic things that go wrong in eyewitness identifications, in suspect interrogations, and in forensic science.  The science concerning these issues is rigorous, well documented, and replicated; moreover, it tells law enforcement not only what *not* to do in order to avoid miscarriages of justice (e.g., don’t do simultaneous lineups) but how to do the same tasks with much lower risk of mistakes (e.g., use sequential lineups).  Yet, with the exception of DNA work, law enforcement has not embraced science.  Most often, it has actively resisted science.  The question at the center of Failed Evidence is why.  If we can understand why, we will begin to understand what can be done to overcome this resistance, and how to have lasting change in the justice system.  The book contains recommendations for creating this kind of change, as well as examples of situations from states in which breakthroughs have happened.

Buy here