Category Archives: Editorials/Opinion

Steubenville, OH Rape Trial – Something’s Not Right

If you’re not familiar with the situation in Steubenville, OH, in which two high school football players are accused of raping a drunk, 16-year-old girl, here is a recent news update.

It’s dangerous to try cases like this in the media.  We don’t have access to the evidence or the testimony, and the outcome must ultimately be up to the jury.

However, the following sentence in the news article caught my attention:

“The trial, which is likely to stretch into the weekend, is moving quickly to accommodate the schedule of the judge. A verdict is expected by Sunday.”

This is WRONG.  Very, very wrong.  Justice should not, cannot, must not be placed on a schedule.

Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Conviction Awards Should Be Taxpayers’ Call to Action

Last Friday a federal jury awarded $13.2 million in compensation to David Ayers, who served 13 years of a life-without-parole prison sentence for a murder that DNA eventually proved he didn’t commit. This should certainly get the attention of Cleveland and Ohio taxpayers if the horror of an innocent person languishing in prison while the true murderer escapes justice is not troubling enough. It should also motivate voters to signal zero tolerance for official misconduct (a recurring contributor to wrongful convictions) and to require implementation of known best practices in criminal justice procedure.

As reported earlier on this blog and (here), and (here), former Cuyahoga County Housing Authority police officer, David Ayers was convicted on December 11, 2000, of Continue reading

Would a universal DNA database aid the innocent?

While the U.S. Supreme Court debates whether police should have the right to take DNA samples from all people arrested for crimes, Eric Posner, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, goes further. He says governments should take DNA from everyone as the best way to prevent wrongful convictions as well as to solve more crimes. You can read his Slate commentary here.

Justice System Should Heed Victim’s Views in False Accusation Case

The past five years have been an unthinkable nightmare for Johnathon Montgomery and his family. Montgomery was sentenced to 60 years in prison after a young woman in her late teens accused him of sexual assault, which she said occurred years earlier when Montgomery was 14 and she was 10 years old. Montgomery spent four years in a Virginia prison before the woman recanted and admitted the crime never happened.  False accusation and false witness are not new to those who have studied DNA-proven wrongful convictions, but how our system responds to one who recants such a damaging lie deserves thoughtful consideration. Continue reading

Coerced Confessions Obscure Justice

Yesterday, Nicole Harris left the Dwight Correctional Center after serving seven years of a thirty year sentence. Her conviction in the death of her son, Jaquari, was overturned by a federal appeals court last October and earlier this month the 7th Court of Appeals ordered Harris’s release. Continue reading

Court of Appeals Orders Release of Imprisoned Chicago Mother

As reported (here) in the Chicago Tribune, Nicole Harris will be freed no later than noon on Monday from Dwight Correctional Center as a result of two court actions. She’s served seven years of a 30-year sentence after being convicted of murder in the death of her four-year-old son, Jaquari.  As reported on this blog and the Chicago Tribune (here), last October a federal appeals court, ruling that Jaquari’s older brother, Dante—five at the time—should have been permitted to testify, reversed Nicole’s conviction. On Wednesday, the 7th Court of Appeals ordered Harris’s release from prison. Continue reading

Why I Think the US Justice System is Broken – and Why It’s Not Getting Fixed

broken column 3I was recently made aware of a quote from the ancient Greek playwright, Euripides. “Ours is a universe in which justice is accidental, and innocence no protection.”  I often feel like this describes our current justice system exactly, but it’s not supposed to be that way, and it doesn’t HAVE to be that way.  As with any system established and run by “humans,” the justice system, including those who run it, is exposed to the entire gamut of human frailties – pride, ego, ambition, greed, envy, passion, deceit, prejudice, hate, intolerance, power, influence, and on and on.  The situation hasn’t really changed since ancient Greece, and I don’t see the nature of humanity changing radically any time in the next  few thousand years, but there are things that can be done to at least mitigate the effect of these human shortcomings on the justice system.  This post will be comprehensive and quite long – so, buckle up, and here we go.  I hope that those of  you who have the patience to read through to the end may find it interesting, enlightening, and hopefully thought provoking.

As you might guess from the title, this post will be “editorial” in nature.  I’ve been doing innocence work for five years now, and have worked with seven different Innocence Projects from across the US and one foreign country.  Over that time, I’ve been exposed to the fine details of over 40 different cases.  These are all post-conviction cases in which there is a belief by the associated Innocence Project in the actual innocence of the defendant, and thus belief of a “wrongful conviction” on the part of the justice system.  In addition, my research in these cases has exposed me to many other additional cases in which a wrongful conviction occurred.  Consequently, I’ve seen a lot of the things that can go wrong in the justice system, and have been able to make judgments about how they happen.  This post will coalesce my observations into statements about why I think the US justice system is broken.  I’m going to be painting a pretty dark picture, so keep in mind that my exposure has been to cases in which the justice system failed, but there are lots of them.  There really isn’t any substantiated data for how many wrongful convictions occur in the US every year, but recent data says it’s between 5,000 and 10,000 per year.  One is too many.  At the end of the post, we’ll talk about why it’s not getting fixed.

I’m not an attorney, and some may accuse me of being a naive, optimistic idealist (which I am) or of tracking muddy footprints through the hallowed halls of justice; but I am only reporting what I have observed.  And if you think I’m making some of this stuff up, I strongly recommend you read the book False Justice: Eight Myths That Convict the Innocent by Jim and Nancy Petro.  (It’s available from amazon.com for $16.)  Jim is a former Attorney General for the state of Ohio, and Nancy, in addition to being an author and advocate, is also a contributing editor to this blog.  Now, are there good and dedicated prosecutors and police out there who are absolutely committed to seeing that true justice is served?  Of course.  Are there qualified and capable attorneys who will do their utmost on behalf of their clients?  Of course.  Unfortunately, there are also “others.”

All that being said  ……..

Why I Think the US Justice System is Broken

(As a preview, we’ll touch upon Bad Lawyers, Prosecutors, Judges, Police, Juries, Junk Science Forensics, False Confessions, Shoddy Work by Medical Examiners, Testimony from Experts Who Aren’t Really Experts, Finality of Judgement, Highly Restrictive Rules for New Evidence, Eyewitness Identification, and Recantations.)

Continue reading

State’s Attorney’s Blind Eye to False Confession Raises Question of Conviction Integrity Sincerity

Center of Wrongful Convictions attorneys Karen Daniel and Judith Royal filed a petition for post-conviction relief (here) two weeks ago in the continuing saga of Daniel Taylor, imprisoned since 1992 for a double murder. The inconvenient conundrum is that Taylor and his lawyers have insisted that his confession was coerced, and official records support Taylor’s claim that he was in a police lockup at the time of the crime. That’s a particularly strong alibi, but thus far, it’s not been enough for Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez. Continue reading

When Prosecutors Defend a Wrongful Conviction, Who Prosecutes the Real Perp?

Clarence Elkins, who spent seven and a half  years incarcerated for crimes DNA proved he did not commit, is having a sickening sense of déjà vu.  His letter to the editor published in the Akron Beacon Journal (here) draws parallels between his wrongful conviction and the case of former Akron police captain Douglas Prade.

In both cases the Summit County Prosecutor resisted considering a wrongful conviction even after DNA testing of crucial crime scene evidence did not match the convicted men. Continue reading

Judge Rules Imprisoned Former Akron Police Captain “Actually Innocent” in Former Wife’s Murder

Summit County Common Pleas Judge Judy Hunter has declared former Akron police Capt. Douglas Prade “actually innocent of aggravated murder” in the killing of his former wife, Dr. Margo Prade. Prade was convicted of her murder in 1997. The judge has ruled that Prade “shall be discharged from prison forthwith.” Continue reading

Ohio’s Faster Compensation for Wrongfully Convicted Faces First Implementation

In September 2012 Ohio lawmakers required a faster track to compensation payment for the wrongfully convicted. The new provision is that “within sixty days after the date of the entry of the determination by the court of common pleas…that a person is a wrongfully imprisoned individual, the clerk of the court of claims shall forward a preliminary judgment to the president of the controlling board requesting the payment of fifty per cent of the amount” of the compensation as authorized by state law. The board is then required to take all actions necessary to make the payment. The new provision will be put to the test this month.

As reported by the Columbus Dispatch (here), Darrell Houston, who spent 16 years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit, is likely to be the first to receive the expedited partial payment, in his case, nearly $380,000. This will be good news for Houston, who has worked at a car wash to meet expenses.

Nevertheless, as is usually the case in wrongful convictions, Houston’s road to exoneration and compensation has been long. Continue reading

“Head Start” on a Motion for Post Conviction Relief Based Upon Newly Discovered Evidence in an Arson Case

arsonRecently, Prof. Theresa Newman, co-director of the Duke Law Wrongful Convictions Clinic, and I collaborated on a motion for post conviction relief in an arson case.  I think it turned out well.  It lays out the framework of a legal strategy to pursue a claim of “newly discovered evidence” in an arson case based upon advances in fire science, and contains citations to current fire science literature and to recognized experts in the field of fire science & arson investigation in support of that claim.  I know of several folks who are currently working on arson cases, and I’m sure there must be others; so I thought this might save some effort in what is a lengthy and difficult process.  Perhaps you can use some of the language and/or the cited references.  The “motion” is attached here for your reference.  All case-specific references have been deleted or obscured, and the case-specific reports of experts are not included, but the cited references to publicly available information are appended after the following link to the generic motion:

Arson Post Conviction Motion – New Evidence

Citations:

Lentini:    The Evolution of Fire Investigation and Its Impact on Arson Cases

Lentini:    The Mythology of Arson_Investigation

Lentini:    Nightmare On Lime Street

Carman:    Improving the Understanding of Post Flashover Fire Behavior

Continue reading

Daily Trial Coverage of Hang Bin Li Shaken Baby Syndrome Case

AnnieHang Bin Li and his wife, Ying Li, were charged with, and imprisoned for, killing their baby daughter, Annie, in October, 2007.  Recently, all charges against Ying Li were dropped, but her husband is currently undergoing a homicide trial in New York.

.

Please see the previous WCB post on the Hang Bin Li case here.

And you can also see the NY Times article, “What Happened to Baby Annie?” here.

The Chinese community in New York has been their only active supporter, through the media and by blog.  A new blog, presenting daily coverage of the trial, has just been initiated.

You can follow daily blog coverage of the Hang Bin Li trial here.

The blog editor would like to draw your particular attention to ‘day 2’ of the trial, during which the neurosurgeon who testified as an expert for the prosecution, Dr. James T. Goodrich, was cross-examined by defense attorney Cedric Ashley.

Science Should Inform Policy on the Use of DNA in Criminal Justice

Should individuals have the right to DNA privacy? The Ohio Supreme Court recently essentially said “No.” The decision prompted opposing opinion pieces in The Plain Dealer (Cleveland) on December 2, 2012. They are enlightening to all considering public policy on the use of DNA testing and DNA profiles in criminal justice. I hope that this summary, as well as this opinion, prompts a broader discussion toward recommended policies on the use of DNA, our most reliable form of human identification in criminal justice.

When and under what conditions biological evidence for DNA testing should be taken and whether or not it should be retained are controversial issues  even within the Innocence community. This is understandable. While DNA testing of Continue reading

The Death Penalty in California

The death penalty in the state of California continues to be a major focus, due in part to the burden it places on taxpayers. The California Innocence Project‘s goal with this infographic was to examine the facts, and the facts alone. Even though California’s Proposition 34 did not pass in the most recent election, this issue will continue to be argued and remain a pressing issue, especially during difficult economic times.

Death Penalty Infographic - An Infographic from CA Innocence Project

Embedded from the California Innocence Project

Vigilante justice goes high-tech in Ohio

Emotions often run high in criminal cases, and the higher they run the greater the likelihood that a defendant may be wrongly convicted.

History is replete with news-media fueled hysteria leading to false allegations and convictions. The 1915 lynching is Leo Frank is one early example. More recently, we saw that in 1989 wrongful convictions explored in the searing new Ken Burns documentary, The Central Park Five, and in the false rape charges filed against three members of the Duke University lacrosse team in 2006.

Another possible injustice is currently unfolding in the Steubenville, Ohio, rape case of two members of the popular Steubenville High School football team. The alleged alcohol-fueled rape of an unconscious 16-year-old girl at a party while other boys supposedly watched and did nothing, has set off an international firestorm.

What makes the media conflagration different in this case is that it has been fueled by bloggers and hackers who contend that other boys should be charged and that authorities are trying to cover up other wrongdoing by people associated with the football team.

Contrary to the narrative perpetrated in the cybersphere, law enforcement was not dismissive of the allegations. The alleged rape occurred on August 11. The girl’s mother reported it to police on August 14. Charges were filed on August 27, the same day that local authorities requested the assistance of the Ohio attorney general’s office for additional investigation.

But that wasn’t good enough for some, particularly a purported local member of the international hacker collective Anonymous who calls himself K.Y.

K.Y. has released a lot of information (and some misinformation) on his LocalLeaks web site. He also has threatened to release the social security numbers and other personal information of people he believes have information on the rape if they don’t come forward.

While some of the information K.Y. has thus-far released might be helpful, much of it seems to be fueled by personal animosity and to have been obtained illegally. (Like some cops and prosecutors, K.Y. apparently feels it’s OK to break the law to make others pay a price for breaking the law.)

This is a new frontier in media-fueled rushes to judgment. While some, including Erika Christakis have expressed concern about this new form of vigilante justice, many in the traditional media have followed the social media’s lead.

What makes this particularly frightening is the instant worldwide distribution via social media of unproven allegations by a masked man who doesn’t mind destroying the reputations of teenagers who may have had nothing to do with the rape in question.

To anyone who cares about justice and the rights of the accused to a fair trial, CNN correspondent Gary Tuchman’s interview with K.Y. should be a cause concern. ”We aren’t the judge nor the jury, but it’s fair to say we are the executioner,” K.Y. said of Anonymous. The hacker added that, because some of the people have ”incriminated themselves” in online tweets and postings, there is no real need to wait for the courts to decide on their guilt or innocence. ”If you think they are guilty, that’s because your conscience is telling you they are guilty,” K.Y. said. Case closed.

Trials often lead to unjust results, particularly in emotionally charged cases. But trials sure beat having the accused subjected to a high-tech lynching by a self-anointed ”executioner” hiding behind a Guy Fawkes mask.

Missouri Supreme Court Overturns Murder Conviction; AG Intends to Retry Case

Yesterday Missouri’s high court in a unanimous decision overturned the murder conviction and life sentence of Mark Woodworth, 37, in connection with the fatally shooting of Catherine Robertson and the wounding of her husband, Lyndel, as they slept in their home near Chillicothe, a town of less than 10,000 in northern Missouri. The court ruled that prosecutors had withheld evidence that would have been beneficial to Woodworth’s defense and ordered his release within 60 days of the finalized ruling, unless prosecutors file documents to retry him.

Attorney General Chris Koster indicated through a spokesperson later in the day that his office would retry Woodworth. Continue reading

Michael Hash Sues Current and Former Public Officials after Wrongful Conviction

Michael Hash, who served nearly 12 years in prison before U.S. District Court Judge James C. Turk granted his release on a Habeas Corpus ruling, has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in which he is seeking damages to be awarded—as reported in The Free Lance-Star of Fredricksburg (here)—“in such amounts as the Court and jury find fair and reasonably supported by the evidence and that will deter such conduct by defendants in the future.” Hash has asked for a jury trial.

The defendants named in the lawsuit are former Culpeper (VA) County Commonwealth’s Attorney Gary Close; three Culpeper Sheriff Continue reading

2012: A Banner Year for the Cause of Reducing Wrongful Conviction

January 1, 2013

For those involved in the cause of improving criminal justice, the ringing in of a new year prompts reflection on mankind’s progress toward equal, fair, and accurate justice for all, the foundation of just societies and sustainable peace. By any measure, 2012 marked many advances for those dedicated to truth in criminal justice. Progress was made in achieving exonerations; expanding awareness, understanding, and activism; advocating for best practices in criminal justice policies and procedures; and increasing knowledge that can inform more accurate verdicts.

Here are ten notable advances achieved in the name of true justice in 2012: Continue reading

Witnessed Baby Shakings – Shaken Baby Syndrome

BabyShake

This article addresses Shaken Baby Syndrome, SBS (now officially renamed Abusive Head Trauma – AHT), and the so-called “triad” of symptoms that the bulk of the medical establishment and the justice system say are pathognomonic (exclusively indicative of) of SBS.  The “triad” consists of retinal hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and diffuse edema of the brain, and according to largely prevailing medical wisdom, violent shaking or abusive head trauma is the only thing that can cause these symptoms in an infant or child – not diseases or genetic conditions or short falls.

Documented, witnessed baby shakings are a rare event.  Charges of SBS are almost universally brought against care givers in situations in which there are no witnesses, and the determination of SBS rests solely upon a medical opinion.  Prof. Deborah Tuerkheimer of DePaul University has said that a “post mortem determination of SBS is essentially a medical diagnosis of murder.”

Continue reading