Category Archives: Exonerations

Exoneration in Canada Yesterday…

7992422.binFrom TheProvince.com:

A special prosecutor has concluded that a miscarriage of justice took place in the case of a man convicted more than seven years ago of sexual assault.

Lawyer Peter Wilson was appointed in September 2011 to review a conviction for sexual assault against Gurdev Singh Dhillon.

Dhillon had been convicted in October 2005 following a trial in B.C. Provincial Court in Surrey.

The case against Dhillon included an in-court identification of him as one of the two perpetrators of the July 2004 sexual assault and other evidence of his presence at the scene.

Dhillon was sentenced to four years in prison. Appeals of both his conviction and sentence were dismissed in 2006.

According to Surrey RCMP, in August 2011, sexual-offence investigators who were reviewing the investigation that led to Dhillon’s conviction determined that the initial investigation “did not sufficiently consider additional avenues regarding other potential suspects.”

This information was not shared with prosecutors or defence lawyers during the original trial or Dhillon’s appeals.

In September 2011, Surrey RCMP alerted the Criminal Justice Branch and asked Delta police to conduct an independent external review and a parallel investigation into the original sexual assault complaint. That let to Wilson’s appointment

“Based on his consideration of the material as a whole, and in light of the issues raised at Mr. Dhillon’s trial, the special prosecutor has concluded that a miscarriage of justice occurred,” a news release from the Criminal Justice Branch stated Wednesday.

“This conclusion relates to the fairness of Mr. Dhillon’s trial based on non-disclosure to him of material evidence.”

Wilson has recommended that Dhillon be provided with full disclosure of the materials reviewed by the special prosecutor and an opportunity to apply to have his conviction set aside.

Surrey RCMP Supt. Bill Fordy issued an apology Wednesday.

“I recognize, and understand, that the general public will have concerns about this incident. I share those concerns and deeply regret the impacts these mistakes may have had on all those involved,” Fordy said in a news release.

“When the mistakes were brought to my attention, I, and other senior managers, took the corrective steps available to us.”

Wilson has also approved charges against two other men.

Mohammed Zaaid Ukhttar and Sital Singh Bhatti were charged Feb. 12 with one count each of sexual assault. First court appearances have been scheduled for April 5.

2012 Exonerations involving Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office

Nancy Petro recently blogged here about the exoneration of Jabbar Collins, who is now bringing a civil suit against the City of Brooklyn and individual prosecutorial staff for misconduct in his case.

The year of 2012 saw the discovery of additional cases of misconduct involving same district attorney’s office, leading to the exoneration of Ronald Bozeman, Lawrence Williams, and Darrell Dula in three different criminal cases.

All three spent 10 months to 2 years in jail due to governmental misconduct before being released for crimes they did not commit. Read more about them here, here, and here.

Judge Rules Imprisoned Former Akron Police Captain “Actually Innocent” in Former Wife’s Murder

Summit County Common Pleas Judge Judy Hunter has declared former Akron police Capt. Douglas Prade “actually innocent of aggravated murder” in the killing of his former wife, Dr. Margo Prade. Prade was convicted of her murder in 1997. The judge has ruled that Prade “shall be discharged from prison forthwith.” Continue reading

“Not innocent enough” victims of miscarriages lose claims for compensation

Barry George, (subject of previous blog post here…) and three others, have lost their claims for compensation from the government, following the overturning of their wrongful convictions. One of the claimants, DID win his claim. Ian Lawless served eight years for a murder that he did not commit. He was jailed for life in 2002 and yesterday, a UK High Court judge ruled that the decision not to award Mr Lawless compensation, was legally flawed, and the government must re-consider. This leaves the door open for him to succeed in gaining compensation (read here…)

Barry-George-should-be-en-003

However, the other four claimants LOST their appeals to the High Court, with ramifications for all victims of miscarriages of justice in the UK.

The Court ruled that the government decision to not award payouts to those against who there was evidence that could possibly indicate their guilt was legal, applying for the first time, the Supreme Court ruling that a miscarriage of justice ONLY occurs when: a miscarriage of justice occurs “when a new or newly discovered fact shows conclusively that the evidence against a defendant has been so undermined that no conviction could possibly be based upon it”. Thus, not all those who have convictions overturned will qualify for compensation: “Procedural deficiencies that led to irregularities in the trial or errors in the investigation of offences will not suffice to establish entitlement to compensation”. It was concluded that a jury could STILL find a verdict of guilt against Barry George, thus, he was not a clearly ‘innocent’ person and the government were justified in refusing him compensation.

There are a further 11 cases awaiting a hearing, but with this decision, it is highly unlikely that the High Court will waiver, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2011, will stand firm. Barry George therefore, along with many others, will continue to live with the cloud over their head, that they have yet to ‘prove their innocence’, as many media outlets are reporting. See here….

“Not innocent enough”: Barry George loses compensation bid over wrongful conviction for Jill Dando murder

Barry George loses compensation bid over Jill Dando conviction

Barry George loses compensation case

Convicted for Not Speaking Spanish

TWO NAHUA INDIGENOUS MEN INCARCERATED IN MEXICO FOR NEARLY THREE YEARS FOR NOT SPEAKING SPANISH

Nahuas
José Ramón Aniceto Gómez (64-years-old) and Pascual Agustín Cruz (48-years-old) were recently exonerated by the Supreme Court of Mexico after almost three years in prison. The nahua men from Atla, a community north of Puebla, Mexico, were arrested in January of 2010. In 2008, the men were chosen by their community to lead a movement to ensure free water. If they were successful, their efforts would harm the economic and political interests of the Mexican PRI political party. The men were sentenced to six years and 10 months for a crime against which they could not even defend themselves because they did not speak Spanish.
Before the case was resolved, Amnesty International declared the men “prisoners of conscience” after more than 30,000 letters were delivered to the Mexican government asking for the men’s freedom. The Supreme Court of Mexico ruled in the men’s favor 4 to 1 after noting multiple inconsistencies in the case. Prosecutors claimed the men robbed a truck; a crime shown to never have occurred. The court also ruled the men’s due process rights were violated because they were not allowed access to an interpreter during their incarceration and trial process.
The men were defended by lawyers from the Center of Human Rights Augustín Pro Juárez. A representative from Amnesty International, Daniel Zapico, said “there may be many other cases of innocent people in jail.”
For more information visit the following source of this information: http://www.proceso.com.mx/?p=326474 Photo credit to Centro Prodh

Ohio’s Faster Compensation for Wrongfully Convicted Faces First Implementation

In September 2012 Ohio lawmakers required a faster track to compensation payment for the wrongfully convicted. The new provision is that “within sixty days after the date of the entry of the determination by the court of common pleas…that a person is a wrongfully imprisoned individual, the clerk of the court of claims shall forward a preliminary judgment to the president of the controlling board requesting the payment of fifty per cent of the amount” of the compensation as authorized by state law. The board is then required to take all actions necessary to make the payment. The new provision will be put to the test this month.

As reported by the Columbus Dispatch (here), Darrell Houston, who spent 16 years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit, is likely to be the first to receive the expedited partial payment, in his case, nearly $380,000. This will be good news for Houston, who has worked at a car wash to meet expenses.

Nevertheless, as is usually the case in wrongful convictions, Houston’s road to exoneration and compensation has been long. Continue reading

Monday’s Quick Clicks…

click
  • Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University 2012 report, outlining 5 exonerations during 2012
  • Judge in Texas considering new trial in arson case of Ed Graf
  • Charges dropped against detective accused of lying in the Tim Masters wrongful conviction case in Colorado
  • Wisconsin Innocence Project wins new trial for Seneca Malone, in prison for murder, based on ineffective assistance of counsel
  • RIP exoneree Bennett Barbour

New States Attorney Vacates Conviction; Ends Long Journey to Exoneration

Bennie Starks was overjoyed, struggled to find words, and fought back tears yesterday, January 7, 2013, after newly elected Lake County (IL) State’s Attorney Mike Nerheim officially vacated his charge of aggravated battery. A rape charge against Starks had already been dropped in May. Starks spent 20 years in prison after being convicted of the charges, stemming from the 1986 assault and battery of a 68-year-old woman, until DNA testing and challenges to other evidence in the case prompted an overturning of his rape conviction. Continue reading

Michael Hash Sues Current and Former Public Officials after Wrongful Conviction

Michael Hash, who served nearly 12 years in prison before U.S. District Court Judge James C. Turk granted his release on a Habeas Corpus ruling, has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in which he is seeking damages to be awarded—as reported in The Free Lance-Star of Fredricksburg (here)—“in such amounts as the Court and jury find fair and reasonably supported by the evidence and that will deter such conduct by defendants in the future.” Hash has asked for a jury trial.

The defendants named in the lawsuit are former Culpeper (VA) County Commonwealth’s Attorney Gary Close; three Culpeper Sheriff Continue reading

2012: A Banner Year for the Cause of Reducing Wrongful Conviction

January 1, 2013

For those involved in the cause of improving criminal justice, the ringing in of a new year prompts reflection on mankind’s progress toward equal, fair, and accurate justice for all, the foundation of just societies and sustainable peace. By any measure, 2012 marked many advances for those dedicated to truth in criminal justice. Progress was made in achieving exonerations; expanding awareness, understanding, and activism; advocating for best practices in criminal justice policies and procedures; and increasing knowledge that can inform more accurate verdicts.

Here are ten notable advances achieved in the name of true justice in 2012: Continue reading

Singapore: High Court Quashes Drunk-driving Conviction

The Singapore High Court has quashed the drunk-driving conviction of Daniel Au on the basis that he had fallen into a drunken sleep while the car was parked rather than driving it while drunk. Mr Au was earlier punished with a two-week jail sentence, a driving ban, and a fine. He had appealed his conviction while serving his jail sentence, which was then quashed by the High Court. It has been reported that his new lawyer, Mr Peter Fernando, argued during appeal that the district judge who had sentenced his client had not “indicated that there was any evidence to show he had driven under the influence of alcohol or posed a risk to other road users.” Mr Au, who is to have his fine refunded and his driving license restored, is also reported to have said that his time spent in jail was “not easy”.

Monday Quick Clicks…

  • clickD.C. judge exonerates Santae Tribble in 1978 murder; cites DNA test that showed hair evidence at trial was flawed
  • Innocence Network exoneration report for 2012
  • Video story about the Ohio Innocence Project’s Roger Dean Gillispie case
  • Murder exoneree Kerry Porter sues the Louisville, KY police department

Plea bargains deserve greater attention

A 60 Minutes report Sunday on the prevalence of false-confession cases in Chicago has garnered the issue renewed and much-deserved attention, as reported by Mark Godsey here and Phil Locke here.

Questions about how false confessions happen — and continue to happen no matter how many cautionary cases are brought to light, is an ongoing mystery. As noted in this excellent explanation of the issue in The Jury Expert, false confessions in North America date back to at least 1692 and the Salem Witch Trials.

Unfortunately, a more prevalent form false confession — guilty pleas by innocent defendants — gets far less attention. Some nations prohibit plea bargains to prevent this problem, but they are integral part of the criminal-justice system in the United States, where more than 90 percent of cases end with guilty pleas. As Danny Weil argues in a pointed essay here, the growth of pea bargains in the Unites States has become ”a historical canker sore on the judicial system” that has helped foster America’s mushrooming incarceration rate over the past three decades.

Even worse, when evidence of innocence of a person who pled guilty later surfaces, court rules make it extremely difficult to get a conviction reversed. For every guilty person like former football star Brian Banks who is allowed to clear his name, dozens of others are denied the opportunity because of the system’s strict rules against reopening cases that ended in guilty pleas. This is an issue that deserves much more attention.

National Registry of Exonerations Grows Steadily, with Little Fanfare

About six weeks ago, the National Registry of Exonerations reached the milestone of  1,000. Today the tally is 1,033. Each added case is accompanied by a name, a photo, and the story of a life completely disrupted or virtually destroyed by a miscarriage of justice. As the number grows, it sounds a wake-up call ever louder, but the sheer numbers can also numb us to the human impact of each wrongful conviction and hard-won exoneration. A recently added name is Alfonso Gomez. His story sounds all too familiar, and the lack of attention in the media may be an indication that cases like this are no longer particularly newsworthy. Continue reading

First Innocence Project Dedicated to Women Launched Today in Chicago

The Center on Wrongful Convictions (CWC) at Northwestern Law has been instrumental in exonerating four persons in a category that represents less than seven percent of the more than 1,000 persons who have been exonerated in the United States: Women. Today, the Center will launch its new Women’s Project, the first Innocence Project dedicated to the special needs and circumstances of women who have been wrongfully convicted.

A press conference at 10:00 a.m. in Northwestern Law’s Bluhm Legal Clinic will be followed by an event and reception at the law school at 6:00 p.m. tonight in Lincoln Hall. CWC Lawyer Karen Daniels, one of the leaders of the project, and exonerees Audrey Edmunds, Gloria Killian, Joyce Ann Brown, and Julie Rea, as well as others who have been instrumental in establishing the Center, will discuss its work and goals.

“Women fighting wrongful convictions face special challenges,” said Rob Warden, executive director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions. Continue reading

Lawmakers Need to Heed the Lessons of Wrongful Conviction

Last week Virginia’s Governor and the state’s Attorney General scrambled to find a legal way to release Jonathan Montogmery from prison after his accuser admitted the sexual assault—for which he had served four years—never happened. The Washington Post railed against “balky officials in Richmond who will not move off the dime to free him” in a published opinion (here). However, the editorial also properly identified the “root problem”: Virginia’s 21-day rule.

In states across the country existing laws indicate an unacceptable lack of awareness or concern over the lessons of wrongful conviction. Continue reading

Pardon for Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project Client John Montgomery…

From WTVR.com:

Governor McDonnell just announced a conditional pardon of Johnathan Montgomery.

Tuesday marks twelve days since a judge ordered Jonathan Montgomery to be released from the Greensville Correctional Facility. After the governor’s pardon, Montgomery will be released Tuesday evening.

Montgomery served four years of a prison sentence for sex crimes his accuser now says he never committed. She was arrested on perjury charges, and is  currently out on bond.

Montgomery was serving a seven-year sentence, that began in 2008.

After the judge ordered Montgomery’s release the Attorney General’s Office blocked Montgomery’s release, saying he first must receive an official writ of innocence.

Governor Bob McDonnell was sent, on Monday, a request to pardon Montgomery.

The Innocence Project was working on Montgomery’s case and submitted the request for a conditional pardon.  [Editor’s note:  I believe this was the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project]

An official release from the office of Gov. McDonnell stated that the governor Continue reading

Wednesday’s Quick Clicks…

  • Posthumous pardon sought for a pair of wrongfully convicted Boston men, Henry Tameleo and Louie Greco, who were among a group of Italian-Americans wrongfully convicted of murder amid a FBI set-up in 1968 involving members of the Boston mob and convicted federal agent John Connolly.
  • After more than 15 years behind bars, East Texas man Kenneth Boyd, Jr. is set to be released from prison following the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that he was wrongfully convicted of a triple homicide in Shelby County.
  • Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters to join cast of The Exonerated
  • A review of the film The Central Park 5

Federal Judge Unsettled by D.A.’s Apparent Indifference in Wrongful Conviction

According to The Wall Street Journal (here), Federal Court Judge Frederic Block expressed frustration with the apparent indifference Brooklyn (NY) District Attorney Charles Hynes has shown in response to the “aberrational behavior” of one of his top prosecutors in a case that led to the wrongful conviction of Jabbar Collins in the 1994 murder of Rabbi Abraham Pollack.

Collins, a 10th grade drop-out with high school equivalency and some college, proclaimed his innocence and dedicated himself in prison to utilizing state and federal records laws to obtain information about his case. He bumped into Continue reading

Lawyers, Officials, Work Through Legalities to Free Innocent Man

Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project lawyers are working through this weekend to prepare a request of Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell for a conditional pardon for Johnathon Montgomery, 26. Montgomery has served four years in prison following his 2008 conviction of sexual assault. The crime allegedly happened eight years earlier, in 2000, when Montgomery was 14 and the victim was 10. Montgomery was convicted on the testimony of the victim who was 17 at the time she raised the accusation. Now 22, Elizabeth Coast has recanted her testimony and admitted the assault never happened.

Coast says she made up the assault as a defense and explanation to her parents who discovered her looking at sexually explicit sites on the Internet. The Daily Press first reported on this case. This ABC report also indicates that Coast is being charged with perjury for the false accusation. Continue reading