Posted in Capital punishment, Exonerations, Eyewitness identification, Junk science, Prosecutorial conduct (good and bad), Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged Annie Dookhan, Arson, arson forensic science, Brendan Dassey, capital punishment, Death Penalty, Dennis Maher, DNA, DNA testing, exoneration, Forensic Science Lab, Guilty Plea, informant, jailhouse snitch, Making a Murderer, prosecutorial misconduct, Protein Hair Analysis, Randy Steidl, rodricus crawford, shaken baby syndrome, wrongful conviction
Posted in Access to DNA testing, Exonerations, False confessions, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged DNA, DNA testing, exoneration, false confession, forensic science, Forensic Science Lab, wrongful conviction
Posted in Eyewitness identification, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged DNA, DNA testing, exoneration, eyewitness identification, eyewitness reliability, eyewitness research, Forensic Science Lab, informant, jailhouse snitches, Ryan Ferguson, wrongful conviction
Posted in Compensation/Exoneree compensation, Prosecutorial conduct (good and bad), Reforming/Improving the system, Uncategorized, wrongful conviction
Tagged compensation, DNA, DNA testing, exoneree compensation, false confession, forensic science, Forensic Science Lab, Interrogation, interrogations, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful conviction, wrongful conviction compensation
Forensic Science Lab in Wakayama.– from TBS News.
It was reported today that a scientist at Forensic Science Laboratory in Wakayama Prefectural Police Headquarters had been fabricating reports in criminal cases (Read the news in Japanese here and here). It was revealed that the scientist wrote up reports although he never tested the actual evidence, using his previous reports and copied charts from them. The Wakayama Prefectural Police had been looking into the case since July, after an accusation by fellow scientist.
The alleged scientist works in the chemical division of the lab, which handles the analysis of evidence such as drugs or vehicle paint left at the scene of a traffic accident. The police determined that there had been fabrication of reports in 8 cases between May 2010 through June 2012. These cases include cases involving death of victims and hit-and-run cases. However, the Wakayama Police Department is claiming that the impact of false evidence in actual cases was minimal.
If in fact the scientist had been fabricating evidence, he may face criminal charges. There might have been trials where the reports of the scientist’s “testing” results were introduced and admitted into as evidence. If so, it could be a reason for a retrial.
There have been several incidents of fabrication of evidence by police investigators recently. In Osaka, an officer fabricated results of alcohol testing during enforcement of drunk-driving. In Fukushima, officers lost cigarette butts left at the crime scene and logged in unrelated evidence in their place. Continue reading