Posted in Compensation/Exoneree compensation, Eyewitness identification, forensic science, Uncategorized
Tagged charles fain, compensation, eyewitness identification, forensic science, John Grisham, new trial, recording of interrogation, reform, William Virgil
The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office (SPPO) issued a report on audio and visual recording of interrogations last week (on July 4th, JST).
Demonstration of how the recording would take place during interrogation by prosecutor.
As I posted earlier, the SPPO started recording some interrogations on an experimental basis in 2006. Last week’s report focused on the experimental recording in three Special Investigation Units and ten Special Crime Devision Public Prosecutor’s Office, which took place in 91 cases from March 2011 through April 2012 (note that these offices or branches in the Public Prosecutor’s Office usually involve only white collar crimes). The report revealed what the prosecutors in Japan have to say about the recording of interrogations.
Below are the points worth noting:
1) Interrogations in 91 cases out of 98 were either partially or entirely recorded. The entire interrogation process was recorded in 39 cases. 30 of the cases concerned tax violations.
2) In seven cases, the suspects refused the recording from the beginning of interrogations. In 12 cases, the suspects refused the recording halfway through. The reasons for their refusal include: they were ashamed of being arrested and incarcerated, and they did not want to provide discussions in front of the camera.
3) Recording took place in other prosecutor’s offices in 946 cases out of 1,005 cases, where the charge was a serious offense and the case was to be disposed of by a Lay Judge trial, such as murder. In cases involving persons with intellectual disabilities, 540 cases were recorded (this was all of the cases in this category except where the accused refused). Continue reading