There is a great infographic on scientific intergrity from clinicalpsychology. net for those interested in pushing for greater regulation and accountability for forensic science and educating others on the risks of scientific evidence. See infographic here…
Blog Editor
Mark Godsey
Daniel P. & Judith L. Carmichael Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law; Director, Center for the Global Study of Wrongful Conviction; Director, Rosenthal Institute for Justice/Ohio Innocence Project
Order Here
Contributing Editors
Justin Brooks
Professor, California Western School of Law; Director, California Innocence ProjectOrder his book Wrongful Convictions Cases & Materials 2d ed. here
Cheah Wui Ling
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore
Daniel Ehighalua
Nigerian Barrister
Jessica S. Henry
Associate Professor of Justice Studies, Montclair University
Carey D. Hoffman
Director of Digital Communications, Ohio Innocence Project@OIPCommunicati1
Shiyuan Huang
Associate Professor, Shandong University Law School; Visiting Scholar, University of Cincinnati College of Law
C Ronald Huff
Professor of Criminology, Law & Society and Sociology, University of California-Irvine
Phil Locke
Science and Technology Advisor, Ohio Innocence Project and Duke Law Wrongful Convictions Clinic
Dr. Carole McCartney
Reader in Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Northumbria University
Nancy Petro
Author and Advocate Order her book False Justice here
Kana Sasakura
Professor, Faculty of Law, Konan University Innocence Project Japan
Dr. Robert Schehr
Professor, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona University; Executive Director, Arizona Innocence Project
Ulf Stridbeck
Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway
Martin Yant
Author and Private Investigator Order his book Presumed Guilty here-
Wrongful Convictions Blog 
Carole,
Great graphic. But note, it presumes that a scientific investigation has actually been conducted. So much of forensics has never even done THAT. But the fact that this much misconduct occurs within the scientific community is, frankly – chilling.
Thank You,
Phil Locke
Phil – indeed but I think it puts in perspective the calls (from e.g. the NAS Report) that we need more ‘science’ in our forensic science. If ‘science’ can be this manipulated – perhaps we need to clarify that we want ‘GOOD’ science behind our forensic science! Shouldn’t have thought we needed to clear that up – but looks like we do!
Scope issue in your title: I was expecting to read a post about a science infographic that was bad, false & exaggerated—which would have been far less useful than what you’ve linked to. (So I’m glad I clicked through!)
thanks – just noticed that! will amend!
Thank you for linking to our blog, we greatly appreciate it. We wanted to share another blog that is also relevant to the discussions on this forum: http://forensicnexus.com/blog/is-it-best-to-let-the-guilty-go-free-than-to-imprison-the-innocent/