Justin Brooks
Professor, California Western School of Law; Director,
California Innocence ProjectOrder his book
Wrongful Convictions Cases & Materials 2d ed. here
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore
Daniel Ehighalua
Nigerian Barrister
Associate Professor of Justice Studies, Montclair University
Carey D. Hoffman
Director of Digital Communications,
Ohio Innocence Project@OIPCommunicati1
Shiyuan Huang
Associate Professor, Shandong University Law School; Visiting Scholar, University of Cincinnati College of Law
Professor of Criminology, Law & Society and Sociology, University of California-Irvine
Phil Locke
Science and Technology Advisor, Ohio Innocence Project and Duke Law Wrongful Convictions Clinic
Dr. Carole McCartney
Reader in Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Northumbria University
Nancy Petro
Author and Advocate
Order her book
False Justice here
Professor, Faculty of Law, Konan University Innocence Project Japan
Professor, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona University; Executive Director, Arizona Innocence Project
Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway
Author and Private Investigator
Order his book
Presumed Guilty here
Order Here
Wrongful Convictions Blog 
Reblogged this on Wrongly Convicted Group Website and commented:
Perhaps a name-change might help – “State Justice Attorneys” rather than “Prosecutors”. Language and words can influence beliefs.
Enough with the re-naming and acronyms that obscure or confuses the uninformed public about who holds the power in the government – county, state and federal.
The categories of DA and prosecutors, needs to be applied to wherever it’s been re-named and obscured. The public needs to better understand who holds the absolute power in their state. The public needs to know who has the power to send someone to prison (convictions-at-all costs) and for how long; the prosecutor determines who shall live and who shall die. The prosecutor have no oversight, no transparency and no oversight. And they have absolute immunity.
In Arizona, they’ve labeled a “DA “- County Attorney. Would one believe “County Attorney” holds the position described above?
correction: “The prosecutors have no oversight, no transparency and no oversight. And, they have absolute immunity.
In Arizona, they’ve labeled a “DA “- County Attorney. Who would believe “County Attorney” holds the powerful position with absolute immunity, described above?
What’s needed is to clearly name those who are the “DA’s” / prosecutors among us. They have lobbyists who fill the state legislature hearings – at taxpayer expense – fighting against the public (packed hearing rooms) for meaningful sentencing and criminal justice reform. And we’re paying for our self-destruction and rights being stripped away?